Nathan Michlo

Nathan Michlo, Devon Jarvis, Richard Klein et al.

In this work, we investigate the properties of data that cause popular representation learning approaches to fail. In particular, we find that in environments where states do not significantly overlap, variational autoencoders (VAEs) fail to learn useful features. We demonstrate this failure in a simple gridworld domain, and then provide a solution in the form of metric learning. However, metric learning requires supervision in the form of a distance function, which is absent in reinforcement learning. To overcome this, we leverage the sequential nature of states in a replay buffer to approximate a distance metric and provide a weak supervision signal, under the assumption that temporally close states are also semantically similar. We modify a VAE with triplet loss and demonstrate that this approach is able to learn useful features for downstream tasks, without additional supervision, in environments where standard VAEs fail.

Nathan Michlo, Richard Klein, Steven James

Learning disentangled representations with variational autoencoders (VAEs) is often attributed to the regularisation component of the loss. In this work, we highlight the interaction between data and the reconstruction term of the loss as the main contributor to disentanglement in VAEs. We show that standard benchmark datasets have unintended correlations between their subjective ground-truth factors and perceived axes in the data according to typical VAE reconstruction losses. Our work exploits this relationship to provide a theory for what constitutes an adversarial dataset under a given reconstruction loss. We verify this by constructing an example dataset that prevents disentanglement in state-of-the-art frameworks while maintaining human-intuitive ground-truth factors. Finally, we re-enable disentanglement by designing an example reconstruction loss that is once again able to perceive the ground-truth factors. Our findings demonstrate the subjective nature of disentanglement and the importance of considering the interaction between the ground-truth factors, data and notably, the reconstruction loss, which is under-recognised in the literature.