Jie Xue

Zhijun Chen, Zhe Lu, Qiushi Chen et al.

Short-term traffic flow prediction is a vital branch of the Intelligent Traffic System (ITS) and plays an important role in traffic management. Graph convolution network (GCN) is widely used in traffic prediction models to better deal with the graphical structure data of road networks. However, the influence weights among different road sections are usually distinct in real life, and hard to be manually analyzed. Traditional GCN mechanism, relying on manually-set adjacency matrix, is unable to dynamically learn such spatial pattern during the training. To deal with this drawback, this paper proposes a novel location graph convolutional network (Location-GCN). Location-GCN solves this problem by adding a new learnable matrix into the GCN mechanism, using the absolute value of this matrix to represent the distinct influence levels among different nodes. Then, long short-term memory (LSTM) is employed in the proposed traffic prediction model. Moreover, Trigonometric function encoding is used in this study to enable the short-term input sequence to convey the long-term periodical information. Ultimately, the proposed model is compared with the baseline models and evaluated on two real word traffic flow datasets. The results show our model is more accurate and robust on both datasets than other representative traffic prediction models.

Sujoy Bhore, Chih-Hung Liu, Anurag Murty Naredla et al.

Given a simple polygon $P$ with $n$ vertices, we consider the problem of constructing a data structure for visibility queries: for any query point $q \in P$, compute the visibility polygon of $q$ in $P$. To obtain $O(\log n + k)$ query time, where $k$ is the size of the visibility polygon of $q$, the previous best result requires $O(n^3)$ space. In this paper, we propose a new data structure that uses $O(n^{2+ε})$ space, for any $ε> 0$, while achieving the same query time. If only $O(n^2)$ space is available, the best known result provides $O(\log^2 n + k)$ query time. We improve this to $O(\log n \log \log n + k)$ time. When restricted to $o(n^2)$ space, the only previously known approach, aside from the $O(n)$-time algorithm that computes the visibility polygon without preprocessing, is an $O(n)$-space data structure that supports $O(k \log n)$-time queries. We construct a data structure using $O(n \log n)$ space that answers visibility queries in $O(n^{1/2+ε} + k)$ time. In addition, for the special case in which $q$ lies on the boundary of $P$, we build a data structure of $O(n \log n)$ space supporting $O(\log^2 n + k)$ query time; alternatively, we achieve $O(\log n + k)$ query time using $O(n^{1+ε})$ space. To achieve our results, we propose a new method for decomposing simple polygons, which may be of independent interest.

Huairui Chu, Ajaykrishnan E S, Daniel Lokshtanov et al.

In the Rectangle Stabbing problem, input is a set ${\cal R}$ of axis-parallel rectangles and a set ${\cal L}$ of axis parallel lines in the plane. The task is to find a minimum size set ${\cal L}^* \subseteq {\cal L}$ such that for every rectangle $R \in {\cal R}$ there is a line $\ell \in {\cal L}^*$ such that $\ell$ intersects $R$. Gaur et al. [Journal of Algorithms, 2002] gave a polynomial time $2$-approximation algorithm, while Dom et al. [WALCOM 2009] and Giannopolous et al. [EuroCG 2009] independently showed that, assuming FPT $\neq$ W[1], there is no algorithm with running time $f(k)(|{\cal L}||{\cal R}|)^{O(1)}$ that determines whether there exists an optimal solution with at most $k$ lines. We give the first parameterized approximation algorithm for the problem with a ratio better than $2$. In particular we give an algorithm that given ${\cal R}$, ${\cal L}$, and an integer $k$ runs in time $k^{O(k)}(|{\cal L}||{\cal R}|)^{O(1)}$ and either correctly concludes that there does not exist a solution with at most $k$ lines, or produces a solution with at most $\frac{7k}{4}$ lines. We complement our algorithm by showing that unless FPT $=$ W[1], the Rectangle Stabbing problem does not admit a $(\frac{5}{4}-ε)$-approximation algorithm running in $f(k)(|{\cal L}||{\cal R}|)^{O(1)}$ time for any function $f$ and $ε> 0$.