Eli Putterman

Gil Kur, Eli Putterman

This work studies the computational aspects of multivariate convex regression in dimensions $d \ge 5$. Our results include the \emph{first} estimators that are minimax optimal (up to logarithmic factors) with polynomial runtime in the sample size for both $L$-Lipschitz convex regression, and $Γ$-bounded convex regression under polytopal support. Our analysis combines techniques from empirical process theory, stochastic geometry, and potential theory, and leverages recent algorithmic advances in mean estimation for random vectors and in distribution-free linear regression. These results provide the first efficient, minimax-optimal procedures for non-Donsker classes for which their corresponding least-squares estimator is provably minimax-suboptimal.

Gil Kur, Eli Putterman, Alexander Rakhlin

It is well known that Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) may attain minimax suboptimal rates in terms of the mean squared error (Birgé and Massart, 1993). In this paper, we prove that, under relatively mild assumptions, the suboptimality of ERM must be due to its large bias. Namely, the variance error term of ERM is bounded by the minimax rate. In the fixed design setting, we provide an elementary proof of this result using the probabilistic method. Then, we extend our proof to the random design setting for various models. In addition, we provide a simple proof of Chatterjee's admissibility theorem (Chatterjee, 2014, Theorem 1.4), which states that in the fixed design setting, ERM cannot be ruled out as an optimal method, and then we extend this result to the random design setting. We also show that our estimates imply the stability of ERM, complementing the main result of Caponnetto and Rakhlin (2006) for non-Donsker classes. Finally, we highlight the somewhat irregular nature of the loss landscape of ERM in the non-Donsker regime, by showing that functions can be close to ERM, in terms of $L_2$ distance, while still being far from almost-minimizers of the empirical loss.