Qinsheng Hou

Zidong Zhang, Zhentao Xie, Lingyun Ying et al.

Mini-programs have become a dominant paradigm for lightweight application deployment within super apps such as WeChat. To support seamless integration, super apps provide OAuth mechanisms for user login. However, improper integration of OAuth-based Authentication (OBA) flows by third-party developers can lead to critical security flaws. In this paper, we discover three new types of runtime OBA misuses that differ from prior static-code-based studies, enabling attackers to impersonate victims. To assess their real-world impact, we design and implement MINIAUTH, the first analysis framework for systematically analyzing OBA misuse at scale. MINIAUTH automatically pinpoints the OBA login page of a mini-program, executes the workflow dynamically, and analyzes its runtime behaviors. This enables it to handle obfuscated mini-programs and uncover vulnerabilities that existing approaches cannot detect. Applying MINIAUTH to 44,273 WeChat and 2,721 Baidu mini-programs, we uncover 1,834 misuse cases, including critical logic flaws that enable client-side identity forgery via exposed credentials and authentication bypass through static or plaintext identifiers. Our cross-platform evaluation further shows that such misuses are not confined to a single ecosystem but consistently appear across different mini-program platforms. We also identify a cryptographic design flaw in Baidu's OBA APIs that allows brute-forcing of session keys. We responsibly disclosed our findings to the developers and platforms, receiving acknowledgments and assigned CNVD/CNNVD IDs. These results underscore the need for more robust developer guidance and enhanced platform-level safeguards.

Shuli Zhao, Qinsheng Hou, Zihan Zhan et al.

Large language models(LLMs) are increasingly integrated with external systems through the Model Context Protocol(MCP),which standardizes tool invocation and has rapidly become a backbone for LLM-powered applications. While this paradigm enhances functionality,it also introduces a fundamental security shift:LLMs transition from passive information processors to autonomous orchestrators of task-oriented toolchains,expanding the attack surface,elevating adversarial goals from manipulating single outputs to hijacking entire execution flows. In this paper,we identify and characterize a systematic privacy-leakage attack pattern,termed Parasitic Toolchain Attacks,instantiated as MCP Unintended Privacy Disclosure(MCP-UPD). These attacks require no direct victim interaction;instead,adversaries embed malicious instructions into external data sources that LLMs access during legitimate tasks. Unlike traditional prompt injection and tool poisoning attacks,our attack targets the interconnected toolchain itself,assembling multiple legitimate tools into a coordinated workflow whose combined behavior accomplishes malicious objectives. In MCP-UPD,the malicious logic infiltrates the toolchain and unfolds in three phases:Parasitic Ingestion,Privacy Collection,and Privacy Disclosure,culminating in stealthy exfiltration of private data. Our root cause analysis reveals that MCP lacks both context-tool isolation and least-privilege enforcement,enabling adversarial instructions to propagate unchecked into sensitive tool invocations. To assess the severity,we design MCP-SEC and conduct the first large-scale security census of the MCP ecosystem,analyzing 12230 tools across 1360 servers. Our findings show that the MCP ecosystem is rife with real-world exploitable gadgets and diverse attack methods,underscoring systemic risks in MCP platforms and the urgent need for defense mechanisms in LLM-integrated environments.