Jonathan S. Kent

LG
6papers
3citations
Novelty54%
AI Score38

6 Papers

LGJun 23, 2022
Indecision Trees: Learning Argument-Based Reasoning under Quantified Uncertainty

Jonathan S. Kent, David H. Menager

Using Machine Learning systems in the real world can often be problematic, with inexplicable black-box models, the assumed certainty of imperfect measurements, or providing a single classification instead of a probability distribution. This paper introduces Indecision Trees, a modification to Decision Trees which learn under uncertainty, can perform inference under uncertainty, provide a robust distribution over the possible labels, and can be disassembled into a set of logical arguments for use in other reasoning systems.

LGOct 20, 2022
Chaos Theory and Adversarial Robustness

Jonathan S. Kent

Neural networks, being susceptible to adversarial attacks, should face a strict level of scrutiny before being deployed in critical or adversarial applications. This paper uses ideas from Chaos Theory to explain, analyze, and quantify the degree to which neural networks are susceptible to or robust against adversarial attacks. To this end, we present a new metric, the "susceptibility ratio," given by $\hat Ψ(h, θ)$, which captures how greatly a model's output will be changed by perturbations to a given input. Our results show that susceptibility to attack grows significantly with the depth of the model, which has safety implications for the design of neural networks for production environments. We provide experimental evidence of the relationship between $\hat Ψ$ and the post-attack accuracy of classification models, as well as a discussion of its application to tasks lacking hard decision boundaries. We also demonstrate how to quickly and easily approximate the certified robustness radii for extremely large models, which until now has been computationally infeasible to calculate directly.

ROApr 1
Robust Geospatial Coordination of Multi-Agent Communications Networks Under Attrition

Jonathan S. Kent, Eliana Stefani, Brian Plancher

Coordinating emergency responses in extreme environments, such as wildfires, requires resilient and high-bandwidth communication backbones. While autonomous aerial swarms can establish ad-hoc networks to provide this connectivity, the high risk of individual node attrition in these settings often leads to network fragmentation and mission-critical downtime. To overcome this challenge, we introduce and formalize the problem of Robust Task Networking Under Attrition (RTNUA), which extends connectivity maintenance in multi-robot systems to explicitly address proactive redundancy and attrition recovery. We then introduce Physics-Informed Robust Employment of Multi-Agent Networks ($Φ$IREMAN), a topological algorithm leveraging physics-inspired potential fields to solve this problem. In our evaluations, $Φ$IREMAN consistently outperforms baselines, and is able to maintain greater than $99.9\%$ task uptime despite substantial attrition in simulations with up to 100 tasks and 500 drones, demonstrating both effectiveness and scalability.

LGAug 17, 2022
Designing with Non-Finite Output Dimension via Fourier Coefficients of Neural Waveforms

Jonathan S. Kent

Ordinary Deep Learning models require having the dimension of their outputs determined by a human practitioner prior to training and operation. For design tasks, this places a hard limit on the maximum complexity of any designs produced by a neural network, which is disadvantageous if a greater allowance for complexity would result in better designs. In this paper, we introduce a methodology for taking outputs of non-finite dimension from neural networks, by learning a "neural waveform," and then taking as outputs the coefficients of its Fourier series representation. We then present experimental evidence that neural networks can learn in this setting on a toy problem.

LGSep 27, 2021
DOODLER: Determining Out-Of-Distribution Likelihood from Encoder Reconstructions

Jonathan S. Kent, Bo Li

Deep Learning models possess two key traits that, in combination, make their use in the real world a risky prospect. One, they do not typically generalize well outside of the distribution for which they were trained, and two, they tend to exhibit confident behavior regardless of whether or not they are producing meaningful outputs. While Deep Learning possesses immense power to solve realistic, high-dimensional problems, these traits in concert make it difficult to have confidence in their real-world applications. To overcome this difficulty, the task of Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) Detection has been defined, to determine when a model has received an input from outside of the distribution for which it is trained to operate. This paper introduces and examines a novel methodology, DOODLER, for OOD Detection, which directly leverages the traits which result in its necessity. By training a Variational Auto-Encoder (VAE) on the same data as another Deep Learning model, the VAE learns to accurately reconstruct In-Distribution (ID) inputs, but not to reconstruct OOD inputs, meaning that its failure state can be used to perform OOD Detection. Unlike other work in the area, DOODLER requires only very weak assumptions about the existence of an OOD dataset, allowing for more realistic application. DOODLER also enables pixel-wise segmentations of input images by OOD likelihood, and experimental results show that it matches or outperforms methodologies that operate under the same constraints.

CVAug 13, 2021
Unsupervised Learning for Target Tracking and Background Subtraction in Satellite Imagery

Jonathan S. Kent, Charles C. Wamsley, Davin Flateau et al.

This paper describes an unsupervised machine learning methodology capable of target tracking and background suppression via a novel dual-model approach. ``Jekyll`` produces a video bit-mask describing an estimate of the locations of moving objects, and ``Hyde`` outputs a pseudo-background frame to subtract from the original input image sequence. These models were trained with a custom-modified version of Cross Entropy Loss. Simulated data were used to compare the performance of Jekyll and Hyde against a more traditional supervised Machine Learning approach. The results from these comparisons show that the unsupervised methods developed are competitive in output quality with supervised techniques, without the associated cost of acquiring labeled training data.