Mingxuan Hu

Xianzhe Zhang, Mingxuan Hu, Bufan Xue et al.

We present SmartWalkCoach, a mobile AI companion that supports the full walking journey: from pre-walk planning to in-walk guidance through to post-walk reflection. Addressing a gap between map navigation and motivational coaching, SmartWalkCoach orchestrates three lightweight agents: (1) GeographyAgent for conversational route curation from nearby points of interest and user preferences while delegating pathfinding to map APIs; (2) AccompanyAgent for context-aware, just-in-time prompts that blend informational cues with relational encouragement; and (3) SummaryAgent for concise reflection and next-step planning. This end-to-end, tool-using design aims to lower cognitive load in planning and sustain engagement and motivation during walking through delivering dynamic, cadence-aware interventions. We conducted an in-the-wild, two-period AB/BA crossover study (N=12), where each participant completed two comparable walks with counterbalanced conditions: Information-only versus Information+Motivation. Linear mixed models show that adding motivational, companion-like dialogue significantly improved outcomes: participants reported higher positive feelings and better user experience, with no evidence of carryover. Thematic analysis surfaced two design imperatives for mobile companions: supportive, relational expression and context-aware timing (e.g., avoiding high-load moments, intervening at fatigue/milestones). Our contributions are: (i) an end-to-end, tool-using agent architecture for everyday walking that reduces cognitive load during planning and accompaniment; (ii) a controlled field evaluation linking context-aware motivation to affect and UX gains; and (iii) actionable design guidance on expression, timing, and frequency for mHealth companions.We outline limitations and paths toward multimodal, voice-first companions, with adaptive personalization mechanisms.

Mingxuan Hu, Hongbo Ma, Xinlan Wu et al.

Audio-based depression detection models have demonstrated promising performance but often suffer from gender bias due to imbalanced training data. Epidemiological statistics show a higher prevalence of depression in females, leading models to learn spurious correlations between gender and depression. Consequently, models tend to over-diagnose female patients while underperforming on male patients, raising significant fairness concerns. To address this, we propose a novel Counterfactual Debiasing Framework grounded in causal inference. We construct a causal graph to model the decision-making process and identify gender bias as the direct causal effect of gender on the prediction. During inference, we employ counterfactual inference to estimate and subtract this direct effect, ensuring the model relies primarily on authentic acoustic pathological features. Extensive experiments on the DAIC-WOZ dataset using two advanced acoustic backbones demonstrate that our framework not only significantly reduces gender bias but also improves overall detection performance compared to existing debiasing strategies.

Ziqi Liu, Yangbin Chen, Ziyang Zhou et al.

Sarcasm detection is a crucial yet challenging Natural Language Processing task. Existing Large Language Model methods are often limited by single-perspective analysis, static reasoning pathways, and a susceptibility to hallucination when processing complex ironic rhetoric, which impacts their accuracy and reliability. To address these challenges, we propose **SEVADE**, a novel **S**elf-**Ev**olving multi-agent **A**nalysis framework with **D**ecoupled **E**valuation for hallucination-resistant sarcasm detection. The core of our framework is a Dynamic Agentive Reasoning Engine (DARE), which utilizes a team of specialized agents grounded in linguistic theory to perform a multifaceted deconstruction of the text and generate a structured reasoning chain. Subsequently, a separate lightweight rationale adjudicator (RA) performs the final classification based solely on this reasoning chain. This decoupled architecture is designed to mitigate the risk of hallucination by separating complex reasoning from the final judgment. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets demonstrate that our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance, with average improvements of **6.75%** in Accuracy and **6.29%** in Macro-F1 score.