Simon Wietheger

Benjamin Doerr, Martin S. Krejca, Simon Wietheger

Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) are among the most widely and successfully applied optimizers for multi-objective problems. However, to store many optimal trade-offs (the Pareto optima) simultaneously, MOEAs are typically run with a large population of solution candidates. This slows down the algorithm and renders the choice of the population size a crucial design decision. In this work, we aim to overcome these difficulties by proposing the dynamic NSGA-II, a variant of the well-known NSGA-II that starts with a small initial population and doubles it after a user-specified number $τ$ of function evaluations, up to a maximum size of $N_{max}$. We prove that the dynamic NSGA-II with optimal parameters computes the Pareto front of the OneMinMax benchmark of size $n$ with high probability in $O(n \log^2 n)$ function evaluations, which is considerably faster than the $Θ(n^2 \log n)$ runtime of the static NSGA-II with optimal parameters. For the OneJumpZeroJump benchmark with gap size $k$, we show a runtime of $O(n^k \log^2 n)$, improving upon the known runtime of $Θ(n^{k+1})$. We also propose a variant that uses the initial population size for a longer period and achieves slightly better performance. Finally, we show that a simple concurrent-run strategy turns our dynamic NSGA-II variants into parameter-less algorithms that exceed the above runtimes only by a logarithmic factor and hence still outperform the static NSGA-II by a factor of $\tildeΩ(n)$.

Simon Wietheger, Benjamin Doerr

The Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) is the most prominent multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for real-world applications. While it performs evidently well on bi-objective optimization problems, empirical studies suggest that it is less effective when applied to problems with more than two objectives. A recent mathematical runtime analysis confirmed this observation by proving the NGSA-II for an exponential number of iterations misses a constant factor of the Pareto front of the simple 3-objective OneMinMax problem. In this work, we provide the first mathematical runtime analysis of the NSGA-III, a refinement of the NSGA-II aimed at better handling more than two objectives. We prove that the NSGA-III with sufficiently many reference points -- a small constant factor more than the size of the Pareto front, as suggested for this algorithm -- computes the complete Pareto front of the 3-objective OneMinMax benchmark in an expected number of O(n log n) iterations. This result holds for all population sizes (that are at least the size of the Pareto front). It shows a drastic advantage of the NSGA-III over the NSGA-II on this benchmark. The mathematical arguments used here and in previous work on the NSGA-II suggest that similar findings are likely for other benchmarks with three or more objectives.

Katrin Casel, Tobias Friedrich, Martin Schirneck et al.

The study of algorithmic fairness received growing attention recently. This stems from the awareness that bias in the input data for machine learning systems may result in discriminatory outputs. For clustering tasks, one of the most central notions of fairness is the formalization by Chierichetti, Kumar, Lattanzi, and Vassilvitskii [NeurIPS 2017]. A clustering is said to be fair, if each cluster has the same distribution of manifestations of a sensitive attribute as the whole input set. This is motivated by various applications where the objects to be clustered have sensitive attributes that should not be over- or underrepresented. We discuss the applicability of this fairness notion to Correlation Clustering. The existing literature on the resulting Fair Correlation Clustering problem either presents approximation algorithms with poor approximation guarantees or severely limits the possible distributions of the sensitive attribute (often only two manifestations with a 1:1 ratio are considered). Our goal is to understand if there is hope for better results in between these two extremes. To this end, we consider restricted graph classes which allow us to characterize the distributions of sensitive attributes for which this form of fairness is tractable from a complexity point of view. While existing work on Fair Correlation Clustering gives approximation algorithms, we focus on exact solutions and investigate whether there are efficiently solvable instances. The unfair version of Correlation Clustering is trivial on forests, but adding fairness creates a surprisingly rich picture of complexities. We give an overview of the distributions and types of forests where Fair Correlation Clustering turns from tractable to intractable. The most surprising insight to us is the fact that the cause of the hardness of Fair Correlation Clustering is not the strictness of the fairness condition.

Robert Ganian, Hung P. Hoang, Simon Wietheger

We study the computational problem of computing a fair means clustering of discrete vectors, which admits an equivalent formulation as editing a colored matrix into one with few distinct color-balanced rows by changing at most $k$ values. While NP-hard in both the fairness-oblivious and the fair settings, the problem is well-known to admit a fixed-parameter algorithm in the former ``vanilla'' setting. As our first contribution, we exclude an analogous algorithm even for highly restricted fair means clustering instances. We then proceed to obtain a full complexity landscape of the problem, and establish tractability results which capture three means of circumventing our obtained lower bound: placing additional constraints on the problem instances, fixed-parameter approximation, or using an alternative parameterization targeting tree-like matrices.

Robert Ganian, Marlene Gründel, Simon Wietheger

Pearl's Causal Hierarchy (PCH) is a central framework for reasoning about probabilistic, interventional, and counterfactual statements, yet the satisfiability problem for PCH formulas is computationally intractable in almost all classical settings. We revisit this challenge through the lens of parameterized complexity and identify the first gateways to tractability. Our results include fixed-parameter and XP-algorithms for satisfiability in key probabilistic and counterfactual fragments, using parameters such as primal treewidth and the number of variables, together with matching hardness results that map the limits of tractability. Technically, we depart from the dynamic programming paradigm typically employed for treewidth-based algorithms and instead exploit structural characterizations of well-formed causal models, providing a new algorithmic toolkit for causal reasoning.

Tian Bai, Fedor V. Fomin, Petr A. Golovach et al.

Rank aggregation seeks a representative permutation for a collection of rankings and plays a central role in areas such as social choice, information retrieval, and computational biology. Two fundamental aggregation tasks are the center and median problems, which minimize the maximum and the total distance to the input permutations, respectively. While these problems are well understood under Kendall's tau and related distances, their parameterized complexity under the Ulam metric, an edit-distance-based metric on permutations, has remained largely unexplored. In this work, we initiate a systematic study of the parameterized complexity of rank aggregation under the Ulam metric. We consider both the center and median problems, as well as their generalizations to the $k$-center and $k$-median clustering settings, parameterized by the number of centers $k$ and the distance budget $d$ (corresponding to the maximum distance for center variants and the total distance for median variants). Both problems are known to be NP-hard already for $k=1$. We show that the Ulam $k$-center problem remains NP-hard when $d=1$, but is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by $k + d$. Our algorithm is based on a novel local-search framework tailored to the non-local nature of Ulam distances. We complement this by proving that no polynomial kernel exists for the $k+d$ parameterization unless NP $\subseteq$ coNP/poly. For the Ulam $k$-median problem parameterized by the total distance $d$, we establish W[1]-hardness and provide an XP algorithm. We also provide a polynomial kernel for the parameter $k + d$, which in turn yields a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm.

Cornelius Brand, Robert Ganian, Fionn Mc Inerney et al.

We perform a refined complexity-theoretic analysis of three classical problems in the context of Hierarchical Task Network Planning: the verification of a provided plan, whether an executable plan exists, and whether a given state can be reached. Our focus lies on identifying structural properties which yield tractability. We obtain new polynomial algorithms for all three problems on a natural class of primitive networks, along with corresponding lower bounds. We also obtain an algorithmic meta-theorem for lifting polynomial-time solvability from primitive to general task networks, and prove that its preconditions are tight. Finally, we analyze the parameterized complexity of the three problems.

Sacha Cerf, Benjamin Doerr, Benjamin Hebras et al.

The Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) is one of the most prominent algorithms to solve multi-objective optimization problems. Recently, the first mathematical runtime guarantees have been obtained for this algorithm, however only for synthetic benchmark problems. In this work, we give the first proven performance guarantees for a classic optimization problem, the NP-complete bi-objective minimum spanning tree problem. More specifically, we show that the NSGA-II with population size $N \ge 4((n-1) w_{\max} + 1)$ computes all extremal points of the Pareto front in an expected number of $O(m^2 n w_{\max} \log(n w_{\max}))$ iterations, where $n$ is the number of vertices, $m$ the number of edges, and $w_{\max}$ is the maximum edge weight in the problem instance. This result confirms, via mathematical means, the good performance of the NSGA-II observed empirically. It also shows that mathematical analyses of this algorithm are not only possible for synthetic benchmark problems, but also for more complex combinatorial optimization problems. As a side result, we also obtain a new analysis of the performance of the global SEMO algorithm on the bi-objective minimum spanning tree problem, which improves the previous best result by a factor of $|F|$, the number of extremal points of the Pareto front, a set that can be as large as $n w_{\max}$. The main reason for this improvement is our observation that both multi-objective evolutionary algorithms find the different extremal points in parallel rather than sequentially, as assumed in the previous proofs.

Julian Berger, Maximilian Böther, Vanja Doskoč et al.

We study learning of indexed families from positive data where a learner can freely choose a hypothesis space (with uniformly decidable membership) comprising at least the languages to be learned. This abstracts a very universal learning task which can be found in many areas, for example learning of (subsets of) regular languages or learning of natural languages. We are interested in various restrictions on learning, such as consistency, conservativeness or set-drivenness, exemplifying various natural learning restrictions. Building on previous results from the literature, we provide several maps (depictions of all pairwise relations) of various groups of learning criteria, including a map for monotonicity restrictions and similar criteria and a map for restrictions on data presentation. Furthermore, we consider, for various learning criteria, whether learners can be assumed consistent.

Julian Berger, Maximilian Böther, Vanja Doskoč et al.

In language learning in the limit, the most common type of hypothesis is to give an enumerator for a language. This so-called $W$-index allows for naming arbitrary computably enumerable languages, with the drawback that even the membership problem is undecidable. In this paper we use a different system which allows for naming arbitrary decidable languages, namely programs for characteristic functions (called $C$-indices). These indices have the drawback that it is now not decidable whether a given hypothesis is even a legal $C$-index. In this first analysis of learning with $C$-indices, we give a structured account of the learning power of various restrictions employing $C$-indices, also when compared with $W$-indices. We establish a hierarchy of learning power depending on whether $C$-indices are required (a) on all outputs; (b) only on outputs relevant for the class to be learned and (c) only in the limit as final, correct hypotheses. Furthermore, all these settings are weaker than learning with $W$-indices (even when restricted to classes of computable languages). We analyze all these questions also in relation to the mode of data presentation. Finally, we also ask about the relation of semantic versus syntactic convergence and derive the map of pairwise relations for these two kinds of convergence coupled with various forms of data presentation.