LGJun 11, 2022
A General framework for PAC-Bayes Bounds for Meta-LearningArezou Rezazadeh
Meta learning automatically infers an inductive bias, that includes the hyperparameter of the base-learning algorithm, by observing data from a finite number of related tasks. This paper studies PAC-Bayes bounds on meta generalization gap. The meta-generalization gap comprises two sources of generalization gaps: the environment-level and task-level gaps resulting from observation of a finite number of tasks and data samples per task, respectively. In this paper, by upper bounding arbitrary convex functions, which link the expected and empirical losses at the environment and also per-task levels, we obtain new PAC-Bayes bounds. Using these bounds, we develop new PAC-Bayes meta-learning algorithms. Numerical examples demonstrate the merits of the proposed novel bounds and algorithm in comparison to prior PAC-Bayes bounds for meta-learning.
LGOct 21, 2020
Conditional Mutual Information-Based Generalization Bound for Meta LearningArezou Rezazadeh, Sharu Theresa Jose, Giuseppe Durisi et al.
Meta-learning optimizes an inductive bias---typically in the form of the hyperparameters of a base-learning algorithm---by observing data from a finite number of related tasks. This paper presents an information-theoretic bound on the generalization performance of any given meta-learner, which builds on the conditional mutual information (CMI) framework of Steinke and Zakynthinou (2020). In the proposed extension to meta-learning, the CMI bound involves a training \textit{meta-supersample} obtained by first sampling $2N$ independent tasks from the task environment, and then drawing $2M$ independent training samples for each sampled task. The meta-training data fed to the meta-learner is modelled as being obtained by randomly selecting $N$ tasks from the available $2N$ tasks and $M$ training samples per task from the available $2M$ training samples per task. The resulting bound is explicit in two CMI terms, which measure the information that the meta-learner output and the base-learner output provide about which training data are selected, given the entire meta-supersample. Finally, we present a numerical example that illustrates the merits of the proposed bound in comparison to prior information-theoretic bounds for meta-learning.