Derek Austin

Iddo Drori, Sarah J. Zhang, Reece Shuttleworth et al. · harvard

A final exam in machine learning at a top institution such as MIT, Harvard, or Cornell typically takes faculty days to write, and students hours to solve. We demonstrate that large language models pass machine learning finals at a human level, on finals available online after the models were trained, and automatically generate new human-quality final exam questions in seconds. Previous work has developed program synthesis and few-shot learning methods to solve university-level problem set questions in mathematics and STEM courses. In this work, we develop and compare methods that solve final exams, which differ from problem sets in several ways: the questions are longer, have multiple parts, are more complicated, and span a broader set of topics. We curate a dataset and benchmark of questions from machine learning final exams available online and code for answering these questions and generating new questions. We show how to generate new questions from other questions and course notes. For reproducibility and future research on this final exam benchmark, we use automatic checkers for multiple-choice, numeric, and questions with expression answers. We perform ablation studies comparing zero-shot learning with few-shot learning and chain-of-thought prompting using GPT-3, OPT, Codex, and ChatGPT across machine learning topics and find that few-shot learning methods perform best. We highlight the transformative potential of language models to streamline the writing and solution of large-scale assessments, significantly reducing the workload from human days to mere machine seconds. Our results suggest that rather than banning large language models such as ChatGPT in class, instructors should teach students to harness them by asking students meta-questions about correctness, completeness, and originality of the responses generated, encouraging critical thinking in academic studies.

Derek Austin, Elliott Chartock

Prompt engineering for large language models (LLMs) is often a manual time-intensive process that involves generating, evaluating, and refining prompts iteratively to ensure high-quality outputs. While there has been work on automating prompt engineering, the solutions generally are either tuned to specific tasks with given answers or are quite costly. We introduce GRAD-SUM, a scalable and flexible method for automatic prompt engineering that builds on gradient-based optimization techniques. Our approach incorporates user-defined task descriptions and evaluation criteria, and features a novel gradient summarization module to generalize feedback effectively. Our results demonstrate that GRAD-SUM consistently outperforms existing methods across various benchmarks, highlighting its versatility and effectiveness in automatic prompt optimization.

Derek Austin

Recent 3D Gaussian splatting methods built atop SMPL achieve remarkable visual fidelity while continually increasing the complexity of the overall training architecture. We demonstrate that much of this complexity is unnecessary: by replacing SMPL with the Momentum Human Rig (MHR), estimated via SAM-3D-Body, a minimal pipeline with no learned deformations or pose-dependent corrections achieves the highest reported PSNR and competitive or superior LPIPS and SSIM on PeopleSnapshot and ZJU-MoCap. To disentangle pose estimation quality from body model representational capacity, we perform two controlled ablations: translating SAM-3D-Body meshes to SMPL-X, and translating the original dataset's SMPL poses into MHR both retrained under identical conditions. These ablations confirm that body model expressiveness has been a primary bottleneck in avatar reconstruction, with both mesh representational capacity and pose estimation quality contributing meaningfully to the full pipeline's gains.