Lucas Larroque

David Carral, Lucas Larroque, Marie-Laure Mugnier et al.

Existential rules are an expressive knowledge representation language mainly developed to query data. In the literature, they are often supposed to be in some normal form that simplifies technical developments. For instance, a common assumption is that rule heads are atomic, i.e., restricted to a single atom. Such assumptions are considered to be made without loss of generality as long as all sets of rules can be normalised while preserving entailment. However, an important question is whether the properties that ensure the decidability of reasoning are preserved as well. We provide a systematic study of the impact of these procedures on the different chase variants with respect to chase (non-)termination and FO-rewritability. This also leads us to study open problems related to chase termination of independent interest.

Lucas Larroque, Quentin Manière

Existential rules are a prominent formalism to enrich a database with knowledge from the domain of interest, but make even basic reasoning tasks on the resulting knowledge base undecidable. To circumvent this, several classes of rules offering various useful properties have been identified. One such class, for instance, contains all sets of rules on which the chase algorithm always terminates, which guarantees the existence of a finite universal model. However, these classes are often abstract rather than concrete: it may be undecidable to check whether a given set of rules belongs to them. Given that the most studied classes of existential rules are designed for reasoning on databases, thus ensuring decidable conjunctive query entailment, we ask: Within a class that supports decidable query entailment, do the usual abstract classes become concrete? We answer in the negative for classes based upon the termination of all classical chase variants and for the bounded treewidth set (BTS) class.

Lucas Larroque, Piotr Ostropolski-Nalewaja, Michaël Thomazo

This paper addresses one of the fundamental open questions in the realm of existential rules: the conjecture on the finite controllability of bounded derivation depth rule sets (bdd $\Rightarrow$ fc). We take a step toward a positive resolution of this conjecture by demonstrating that universal models generated by bdd rule sets cannot contain arbitrarily large tournaments (arbitrarily directed cliques) without entailing a loop query, $\exists{x} E(x, x)$. This simple yet elegant result narrows the space of potential counterexamples to the (bdd $\Rightarrow$ fc) conjecture.