Liang Zhan

Kun Zhao, Bohao Yang, Chen Tang et al.

The long-standing one-to-many problem of gold standard responses in open-domain dialogue systems presents challenges for automatic evaluation metrics. Though prior works have demonstrated some success by applying powerful Large Language Models (LLMs), existing approaches still struggle with the one-to-many problem, and exhibit subpar performance in domain-specific scenarios. We assume the commonsense reasoning biases within LLMs may hinder their performance in domainspecific evaluations. To address both issues, we propose a novel framework SLIDE (Small and Large Integrated for Dialogue Evaluation), that leverages both a small, specialised model (SLM), and LLMs for the evaluation of open domain dialogues. Our approach introduces several techniques: (1) Contrastive learning to differentiate between robust and non-robust response embeddings; (2) A novel metric for semantic sensitivity that combines embedding cosine distances with similarity learned through neural networks, and (3) a strategy for incorporating the evaluation results from both the SLM and LLMs. Our empirical results demonstrate that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in both the classification and evaluation tasks, and additionally the SLIDE evaluator exhibits better correlation with human judgements. Our code is available at https:// github.com/hegehongcha/SLIDE-ACL2024.

Kun Zhao, Chenghao Xiao, Sixing Yan et al.

Radiology Report Generation (RRG) has advanced considerably with the development of multimodal generative models. Despite the progress, the field still faces significant challenges in evaluation, as existing metrics lack robustness and fairness. We reveal that, RRG with high performance on existing lexical-based metrics (e.g. BLEU) might be more of a mirage - a model can get a high BLEU only by learning the template of reports. This has become a pressing issue for RRG due to the highly patternized nature of these reports. In addition, standard radiology reports are often highly technical. Helping patients understand these reports is crucial from a patient's perspective, yet this has been largely overlooked in previous work. In this work, we un-intuitively approach these problems by proposing the Layman's RRG framework that can systematically improve RRG with day-to-day language. Specifically, our framework first contributes a translated Layman's terms dataset. Building upon the dataset, we then propose a semantics-based evaluation method, which is effective in mitigating the inflated numbers of BLEU and provides more robust evaluation. We show that training on the layman's terms dataset encourages models to focus on the semantics of the reports, as opposed to overfitting to learning the report templates. Last, we reveal a promising scaling law between the number of training examples and semantics gain provided by our dataset, compared to the inverse pattern brought by the original formats.