Haozhe Xu

Qinhong Zhou, Sunli Chen, Yisong Wang et al. · cmu

Recent advances in high-fidelity virtual environments serve as one of the major driving forces for building intelligent embodied agents to perceive, reason and interact with the physical world. Typically, these environments remain unchanged unless agents interact with them. However, in real-world scenarios, agents might also face dynamically changing environments characterized by unexpected events and need to rapidly take action accordingly. To remedy this gap, we propose a new simulated embodied benchmark, called HAZARD, specifically designed to assess the decision-making abilities of embodied agents in dynamic situations. HAZARD consists of three unexpected disaster scenarios, including fire, flood, and wind, and specifically supports the utilization of large language models (LLMs) to assist common sense reasoning and decision-making. This benchmark enables us to evaluate autonomous agents' decision-making capabilities across various pipelines, including reinforcement learning (RL), rule-based, and search-based methods in dynamically changing environments. As a first step toward addressing this challenge using large language models, we further develop an LLM-based agent and perform an in-depth analysis of its promise and challenge of solving these challenging tasks. HAZARD is available at https://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/hazard/.

Zailong Tian, Zhuoheng Han, Yanzhe Chen et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used as automated judges, where practical value depends on both accuracy and trustworthy, risk-aware judgments. Existing approaches predominantly focus on accuracy, overlooking the necessity of well-calibrated confidence, which is vital for adaptive and reliable evaluation pipelines. In this work, we advocate a shift from accuracy-centric evaluation to confidence-driven, risk-aware LLM-as-a-Judge systems, emphasizing the necessity of well-calibrated confidence for trustworthy and adaptive evaluation. We systematically identify the Overconfidence Phenomenon in current LLM-as-a-Judges, where predicted confidence significantly overstates actual correctness, undermining reliability in practical deployment. To quantify this phenomenon, we introduce TH-Score, a novel metric measuring confidence-accuracy alignment. Furthermore, we propose LLM-as-a-Fuser, an ensemble framework that transforms LLMs into reliable, risk-aware evaluators. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach substantially improves calibration and enables adaptive, confidence-driven evaluation pipelines, achieving superior reliability and accuracy compared to existing baselines.

Haozhe Xu, Xiaohua Wang, Changze Lv et al.

Conversational recommender systems (CRSs) enhance recommendation quality by engaging users in multi-turn dialogues, capturing nuanced preferences through natural language interactions. However, these systems often face the false negative issue, where items that a user might like are incorrectly labeled as negative during training, leading to suboptimal recommendations.Expanding the label set through data augmentation presents an intuitive solution but faces the challenge of balancing two key aspects: ensuring semantic relevance and preserving the collaborative information inherent in CRS datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel data augmentation framework that first leverages an LLM-based semantic retriever to identify diverse and semantically relevant items, which are then filtered by a relevance scorer to remove noisy candidates. Building on this, we introduce a two-stage training strategy balancing semantic relevance and collaborative information. Extensive experiments on two benchmark datasets and user simulators demonstrate significant and consistent performance improvements across various recommenders, highlighting the effectiveness of our approach in advancing CRS performance.

Haozhe Xu, Yifei Zhao, Wenhao Feng et al.

Locomotion under reduced gravity is commonly realized through jumping, yet continuous pronking in lunar gravity remains challenging due to prolonged flight phases and sparse ground contact. The extended aerial duration increases landing impact sensitivity and makes stable attitude regulation over rough planetary terrain difficult. Existing approaches primarily address single jumps on flat surfaces and lack both continuous-terrain solutions and realistic hardware validation. This work presents a Dual-Horizon Hybrid Internal Model for continuous quadrupedal jumping under lunar gravity using proprioceptive sensing only. Two temporal encoders capture complementary time scales: a short-horizon branch models rapid vertical dynamics with explicit vertical velocity estimation, while a long-horizon branch models horizontal motion trends and center-of-mass height evolution across the jump cycle. The fused representation enables stable and continuous jumping under extended aerial phases characteristic of lunar gravity. To provide hardware-in-the-loop validation, we develop the MATRIX (Mixed-reality Adaptive Testbed for Robotic Integrated eXploration) platform, a digital-twin-driven system that offloads gravity through a pulley-counterweight mechanism and maps Unreal Engine lunar terrain to a motion platform and treadmill in real time. Using MATRIX, we demonstrate continuous jumping of a quadruped robot under lunar-gravity emulation across cratered lunar-like terrain.