Philip S. Marcus

Haris Moazam Sheikh, Tess A. Callan, Kealan J. Hennessy et al.

Finding the optimal design of a hydrodynamic or aerodynamic surface is often impossible due to the expense of evaluating the cost functions (say, with computational fluid dynamics) needed to determine the performances of the flows that the surface controls. In addition, inherent limitations of the design space itself due to imposed geometric constraints, conventional parameterization methods, and user bias can restrict {\it all} of the designs within a chosen design space regardless of whether traditional optimization methods or newer, data-driven design algorithms with machine learning are used to search the design space. We present a 2-pronged attack to address these difficulties: we propose (1) a methodology to create the design space using morphing that we call {\it Design-by-Morphing} (DbM); and (2) an optimization algorithm to search that space that uses a novel Bayesian Optimization (BO) strategy that we call {\it Mixed variable, Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization} (MixMOBO). We apply this shape optimization strategy to maximize the power output of a hydrokinetic turbine. Applying these two strategies in tandem, we demonstrate that we can create a novel, geometrically-unconstrained, design space of a draft tube and hub shape and then optimize them simultaneously with a {\it minimum} number of cost function calls. Our framework is versatile and can be applied to the shape optimization of a variety of fluid problems.

Haris Moazam Sheikh, Philip S. Marcus

Optimizing multiple, non-preferential objectives for mixed-variable, expensive black-box problems is important in many areas of engineering and science. The expensive, noisy, black-box nature of these problems makes them ideal candidates for Bayesian optimization (BO). Mixed-variable and multi-objective problems, however, are a challenge due to BO's underlying smooth Gaussian process surrogate model. Current multi-objective BO algorithms cannot deal with mixed-variable problems. We present MixMOBO, the first mixed-variable, multi-objective Bayesian optimization framework for such problems. Using MixMOBO, optimal Pareto-fronts for multi-objective, mixed-variable design spaces can be found efficiently while ensuring diverse solutions. The method is sufficiently flexible to incorporate different kernels and acquisition functions, including those that were developed for mixed-variable or multi-objective problems by other authors. We also present HedgeMO, a modified Hedge strategy that uses a portfolio of acquisition functions for multi-objective problems. We present a new acquisition function, SMC. Our results show that MixMOBO performs well against other mixed-variable algorithms on synthetic problems. We apply MixMOBO to the real-world design of an architected material and show that our optimal design, which was experimentally fabricated and validated, has a normalized strain energy density $10^4$ times greater than existing structures.