Vasco Grossmann

Lars Schmarje, Vasco Grossmann, Claudius Zelenka et al.

High-quality data is necessary for modern machine learning. However, the acquisition of such data is difficult due to noisy and ambiguous annotations of humans. The aggregation of such annotations to determine the label of an image leads to a lower data quality. We propose a data-centric image classification benchmark with ten real-world datasets and multiple annotations per image to allow researchers to investigate and quantify the impact of such data quality issues. With the benchmark we can study the impact of annotation costs and (semi-)supervised methods on the data quality for image classification by applying a novel methodology to a range of different algorithms and diverse datasets. Our benchmark uses a two-phase approach via a data label improvement method in the first phase and a fixed evaluation model in the second phase. Thereby, we give a measure for the relation between the input labeling effort and the performance of (semi-)supervised algorithms to enable a deeper insight into how labels should be created for effective model training. Across thousands of experiments, we show that one annotation is not enough and that the inclusion of multiple annotations allows for a better approximation of the real underlying class distribution. We identify that hard labels can not capture the ambiguity of the data and this might lead to the common issue of overconfident models. Based on the presented datasets, benchmarked methods, and analysis, we create multiple research opportunities for the future directed at the improvement of label noise estimation approaches, data annotation schemes, realistic (semi-)supervised learning, or more reliable image collection.

Vasco Grossmann, Lars Schmarje, Reinhard Koch

High-quality data is a key aspect of modern machine learning. However, labels generated by humans suffer from issues like label noise and class ambiguities. We raise the question of whether hard labels are sufficient to represent the underlying ground truth distribution in the presence of these inherent imprecision. Therefore, we compare the disparity of learning with hard and soft labels quantitatively and qualitatively for a synthetic and a real-world dataset. We show that the application of soft labels leads to improved performance and yields a more regular structure of the internal feature space.

Lars Schmarje, Vasco Grossmann, Claudius Zelenka et al.

In the field of image classification, existing methods often struggle with biased or ambiguous data, a prevalent issue in real-world scenarios. Current strategies, including semi-supervised learning and class blending, offer partial solutions but lack a definitive resolution. Addressing this gap, our paper introduces a novel strategy for generating high-quality labels in challenging datasets. Central to our approach is a clearly designed flowchart, based on a broad literature review, which enables the creation of reliable labels. We validate our methodology through a rigorous real-world test case in the biomedical field, specifically in deducing height reduction from vertebral imaging. Our empirical study, leveraging over 250,000 annotations, demonstrates the effectiveness of our strategies decisions compared to their alternatives.

Lars Schmarje, Vasco Grossmann, Tim Michels et al.

High-quality data is crucial for the success of machine learning, but labeling large datasets is often a time-consuming and costly process. While semi-supervised learning can help mitigate the need for labeled data, label quality remains an open issue due to ambiguity and disagreement among annotators. Thus, we use proposal-guided annotations as one option which leads to more consistency between annotators. However, proposing a label increases the probability of the annotators deciding in favor of this specific label. This introduces a bias which we can simulate and remove. We propose a new method CleverLabel for Cost-effective LabEling using Validated proposal-guidEd annotations and Repaired LABELs. CleverLabel can reduce labeling costs by up to 30.0%, while achieving a relative improvement in Kullback-Leibler divergence of up to 29.8% compared to the previous state-of-the-art on a multi-domain real-world image classification benchmark. CleverLabel offers a novel solution to the challenge of efficiently labeling large datasets while also improving the label quality.