Helena Stegherr

Helena Stegherr, Michael Heider, Nils Meyer et al.

Evolutionary computation offers a variety of tools to solve complex real-world optimization problems. However, research often focuses on smaller, simplified problems and optimization algorithms that sometimes miss expectations in real-world scenarios. Additionally, trust in the applied algorithm and the solutions it provides is often essential in such settings, but requires an understanding of the search process itself. This leads to evolutionary computation often not being seriously considered by practitioners in many application contexts, among them physics-based modeling. In this article, techniques from evolutionary computation are detailed that can alleviate these problems. First, five real-world physics-based optimization problems are introduced and described by domain experts. For each of these, the requirements for the evolutionary algorithm regarding performance and explainability to increase trust and usability are presented. We found that all domain experts expect fast convergence to a good solution and want some explanations for how the results were formed, while other requirements strongly depend on the respective problem. Finally, we present existing approaches that can be leveraged to improve those aspects of evolutionary algorithms but have to our knowledge never been employed in complex real-world scenarios. This implies a gap between both domains that needs to be closed to exploit the full potential of evolutionary computation.

Michael Heider, Helena Stegherr, Richard Nordsieck et al.

In socio-technical settings, operators are increasingly assisted by decision support systems. By employing these, important properties of socio-technical systems such as self-adaptation and self-optimization are expected to improve further. To be accepted by and engage efficiently with operators, decision support systems need to be able to provide explanations regarding the reasoning behind specific decisions. In this paper, we propose the usage of Learning Classifier Systems, a family of rule-based machine learning methods, to facilitate transparent decision making and highlight some techniques to improve that. We then present a template of seven questions to assess application-specific explainability needs and demonstrate their usage in an interview-based case study for a manufacturing scenario. We find that the answers received did yield useful insights for a well-designed LCS model and requirements to have stakeholders actively engage with an intelligent agent.

Michael Heider, Helena Stegherr, Jonathan Wurth et al.

Achieving at least some level of explainability requires complex analyses for many machine learning systems, such as common black-box models. We recently proposed a new rule-based learning system, SupRB, to construct compact, interpretable and transparent models by utilizing separate optimizers for the model selection tasks concerning rule discovery and rule set composition.This allows users to specifically tailor their model structure to fulfil use-case specific explainability requirements. From an optimization perspective, this allows us to define clearer goals and we find that -- in contrast to many state of the art systems -- this allows us to keep rule fitnesses independent. In this paper we investigate this system's performance thoroughly on a set of regression problems and compare it against XCSF, a prominent rule-based learning system. We find the overall results of SupRB's evaluation comparable to XCSF's while allowing easier control of model structure and showing a substantially smaller sensitivity to random seeds and data splits. This increased control can aid in subsequently providing explanations for both training and final structure of the model.

Michael Heider, Helena Stegherr, Jonathan Wurth et al.

While utilization of digital agents to support crucial decision making is increasing, trust in suggestions made by these agents is hard to achieve. However, it is essential to profit from their application, resulting in a need for explanations for both the decision making process and the model. For many systems, such as common black-box models, achieving at least some explainability requires complex post-processing, while other systems profit from being, to a reasonable extent, inherently interpretable. We propose a rule-based learning system specifically conceptualised and, thus, especially suited for these scenarios. Its models are inherently transparent and easily interpretable by design. One key innovation of our system is that the rules' conditions and which rules compose a problem's solution are evolved separately. We utilise independent rule fitnesses which allows users to specifically tailor their model structure to fit the given requirements for explainability.