Kristoffer H. Madsen

CV
h-index51
7papers
182citations
Novelty51%
AI Score32

7 Papers

2.0CVMar 22, 2024Code
SYNCS: Synthetic Data and Contrastive Self-Supervised Training for Central Sulcus Segmentation

Vladyslav Zalevskyi, Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen

Bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenia (SZ) are severe mental disorders with profound societal impact. Identifying risk markers early is crucial for understanding disease progression and enabling preventive measures. The Danish High Risk and Resilience Study (VIA) focuses on understanding early disease processes, particularly in children with familial high risk (FHR). Understanding structural brain changes associated with these diseases during early stages is essential for effective interventions. The central sulcus (CS) is a prominent brain landmark related to brain regions involved in motor and sensory processing. Analyzing CS morphology can provide valuable insights into neurodevelopmental abnormalities in the FHR group. However, segmenting the central sulcus (CS) presents challenges due to its variability, especially in adolescents. This study introduces two novel approaches to improve CS segmentation: synthetic data generation to model CS variability and self-supervised pre-training with multi-task learning to adapt models to new cohorts. These methods aim to enhance segmentation performance across diverse populations, eliminating the need for extensive preprocessing.

9.0LGApr 7, 2020Code
Probabilistic Spatial Transformer Networks

Pola Schwöbel, Frederik Warburg, Martin Jørgensen et al.

Spatial Transformer Networks (STNs) estimate image transformations that can improve downstream tasks by `zooming in' on relevant regions in an image. However, STNs are hard to train and sensitive to mis-predictions of transformations. To circumvent these limitations, we propose a probabilistic extension that estimates a stochastic transformation rather than a deterministic one. Marginalizing transformations allows us to consider each image at multiple poses, which makes the localization task easier and the training more robust. As an additional benefit, the stochastic transformations act as a localized, learned data augmentation that improves the downstream tasks. We show across standard imaging benchmarks and on a challenging real-world dataset that these two properties lead to improved classification performance, robustness and model calibration. We further demonstrate that the approach generalizes to non-visual domains by improving model performance on time-series data.

2.7MLJun 21, 2018Code
Probabilistic PARAFAC2

Philip J. H. Jørgensen, Søren F. V. Nielsen, Jesper L. Hinrich et al.

The PARAFAC2 is a multimodal factor analysis model suitable for analyzing multi-way data when one of the modes has incomparable observation units, for example because of differences in signal sampling or batch sizes. A fully probabilistic treatment of the PARAFAC2 is desirable in order to improve robustness to noise and provide a well founded principle for determining the number of factors, but challenging because the factor loadings are constrained to be orthogonal. We develop two probabilistic formulations of the PARAFAC2 along with variational procedures for inference: In the one approach, the mean values of the factor loadings are orthogonal leading to closed form variational updates, and in the other, the factor loadings themselves are orthogonal using a matrix Von Mises-Fisher distribution. We contrast our probabilistic formulation to the conventional direct fitting algorithm based on maximum likelihood. On simulated data and real fluorescence spectroscopy and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data, we compare our approach to the conventional PARAFAC2 model estimation and find that the probabilistic formulation is more robust to noise and model order misspecification. The probabilistic PARAFAC2 thus forms a promising framework for modeling multi-way data accounting for uncertainty.

11.4CVOct 2, 2017
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Interpretable Analysis of EEG Sleep Stage Scoring

Albert Vilamala, Kristoffer H. Madsen, Lars K. Hansen

Sleep studies are important for diagnosing sleep disorders such as insomnia, narcolepsy or sleep apnea. They rely on manual scoring of sleep stages from raw polisomnography signals, which is a tedious visual task requiring the workload of highly trained professionals. Consequently, research efforts to purse for an automatic stage scoring based on machine learning techniques have been carried out over the last years. In this work, we resort to multitaper spectral analysis to create visually interpretable images of sleep patterns from EEG signals as inputs to a deep convolutional network trained to solve visual recognition tasks. As a working example of transfer learning, a system able to accurately classify sleep stages in new unseen patients is presented. Evaluations in a widely-used publicly available dataset favourably compare to state-of-the-art results, while providing a framework for visual interpretation of outcomes.

1.2APDec 14, 2016
Scalable Group Level Probabilistic Sparse Factor Analysis

Jesper L. Hinrich, Søren F. V. Nielsen, Nicolai A. B. Riis et al.

Many data-driven approaches exist to extract neural representations of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, but most of them lack a proper probabilistic formulation. We propose a group level scalable probabilistic sparse factor analysis (psFA) allowing spatially sparse maps, component pruning using automatic relevance determination (ARD) and subject specific heteroscedastic spatial noise modeling. For task-based and resting state fMRI, we show that the sparsity constraint gives rise to components similar to those obtained by group independent component analysis. The noise modeling shows that noise is reduced in areas typically associated with activation by the experimental design. The psFA model identifies sparse components and the probabilistic setting provides a natural way to handle parameter uncertainties. The variational Bayesian framework easily extends to more complex noise models than the presently considered.

3.0CVOct 13, 2016
Towards end-to-end optimisation of functional image analysis pipelines

Albert Vilamala, Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen, Lars Kai Hansen

The study of neurocognitive tasks requiring accurate localisation of activity often rely on functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, a widely adopted technique that makes use of a pipeline of data processing modules, each involving a variety of parameters. These parameters are frequently set according to the local goal of each specific module, not accounting for the rest of the pipeline. Given recent success of neural network research in many different domains, we propose to convert the whole data pipeline into a deep neural network, where the parameters involved are jointly optimised by the network to best serve a common global goal. As a proof of concept, we develop a module able to adaptively apply the most suitable spatial smoothing to every brain volume for each specific neuroimaging task, and we validate its results in a standard brain decoding experiment.

4.3APJan 4, 2016
Nonparametric Modeling of Dynamic Functional Connectivity in fMRI Data

Søren F. V. Nielsen, Kristoffer H. Madsen, Rasmus Røge et al.

Dynamic functional connectivity (FC) has in recent years become a topic of interest in the neuroimaging community. Several models and methods exist for both functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG), and the results point towards the conclusion that FC exhibits dynamic changes. The existing approaches modeling dynamic connectivity have primarily been based on time-windowing the data and k-means clustering. We propose a non-parametric generative model for dynamic FC in fMRI that does not rely on specifying window lengths and number of dynamic states. Rooted in Bayesian statistical modeling we use the predictive likelihood to investigate if the model can discriminate between a motor task and rest both within and across subjects. We further investigate what drives dynamic states using the model on the entire data collated across subjects and task/rest. We find that the number of states extracted are driven by subject variability and preprocessing differences while the individual states are almost purely defined by either task or rest. This questions how we in general interpret dynamic FC and points to the need for more research on what drives dynamic FC.