Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

Shahaf Bassan, Yossi Adi, Jeffrey S. Rosenschein

Symbolic music segmentation is the process of dividing symbolic melodies into smaller meaningful groups, such as melodic phrases. We proposed an unsupervised method for segmenting symbolic music. The proposed model is based on an ensemble of temporal prediction error models. During training, each model predicts the next token to identify musical phrase changes. While at test time, we perform a peak detection algorithm to select segment candidates. Finally, we aggregate the predictions of each of the models participating in the ensemble to predict the final segmentation. Results suggest the proposed method reaches state-of-the-art performance on the Essen Folksong dataset under the unsupervised setting when considering F-Score and R-value. We additionally provide an ablation study to better assess the contribution of each of the model components to the final results. As expected, the proposed method is inferior to the supervised setting, which leaves room for improvement in future research considering closing the gap between unsupervised and supervised methods.

Ilai Shraga, Guy Azran, Matthias Gerstgrasser et al.

To effectively operate in various dynamic scenarios, RL agents must be resilient to unexpected changes in their environment. Previous work on this form of resilience has focused on single-agent settings. In this work, we introduce and formalize a multi-agent variant of resilience, which we term group resilience. We further hypothesize that collaboration with other agents is key to achieving group resilience; collaborating agents adapt better to environmental perturbations in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) settings. We test our hypothesis empirically by evaluating different collaboration protocols and examining their effect on group resilience. Our experiments show that all the examined collaborative approaches achieve higher group resilience than their non-collaborative counterparts.

Haris Aziz, Omer Lev, Nicholas Mattei et al.

Peer reviews, evaluations, and selections are a fundamental aspect of modern science. Funding bodies the world over employ experts to review and select the best proposals from those submitted for funding. The problem of peer selection, however, is much more general: a professional society may want to give a subset of its members awards based on the opinions of all members; an instructor for a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) or an online course may want to crowdsource grading; or a marketing company may select ideas from group brainstorming sessions based on peer evaluation. We make three fundamental contributions to the study of peer selection, a specific type of group decision-making problem, studied in computer science, economics, and political science. First, we propose a novel mechanism that is strategyproof, i.e., agents cannot benefit by reporting insincere valuations. Second, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our mechanism by a comprehensive simulation-based comparison with a suite of mechanisms found in the literature. Finally, our mechanism employs a randomized rounding technique that is of independent interest, as it solves the apportionment problem that arises in various settings where discrete resources such as parliamentary representation slots need to be divided proportionally.