Thi Huyen Nguyen

Abeer Mostafa, Thi Huyen Nguyen, Zahra Ahmadi

Assessing originality in AI research is arguably the most consequential yet least reliable step in peer review. Reviewer judgments of originality remain opaque, inconsistent, and dependent on comparisons to prior work that are often incomplete. In this paper, we present a large-scale, data-driven qualitative and quantitative analysis of research originality based on over 100,000 peer-review reports from leading AI venues, spanning a period of rapid growth in the field. Leveraging structured, semantically retrieved prior work and signals embedded in expert reviewer assessments, we systematically characterize how originality is perceived in practice and identify the key dimensions that most strongly influence novelty judgments. Our analysis yields a fine-grained, evidence-based framework that equips both authors and reviewers with actionable insights into how originality is evaluated. In addition, we evaluate the reliability of current large language model (LLM) agents in assessing originality. We find that these models tend to systematically overestimate novelty and struggle to detect conceptual plagiarism, particularly in the presence of paraphrasing. We release our dataset, trained models, and code at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Novelty-Reviewer-365C/.

Tai Le Quy, Thi Huyen Nguyen, Gunnar Friege et al.

Predicting students' academic performance is one of the key tasks of educational data mining (EDM). Traditionally, the high forecasting quality of such models was deemed critical. More recently, the issues of fairness and discrimination w.r.t. protected attributes, such as gender or race, have gained attention. Although there are several fairness-aware learning approaches in EDM, a comparative evaluation of these measures is still missing. In this paper, we evaluate different group fairness measures for student performance prediction problems on various educational datasets and fairness-aware learning models. Our study shows that the choice of the fairness measure is important, likewise for the choice of the grade threshold.

Thi Huyen Nguyen, Koustav Rudra, Wolfgang Nejdl

Advances in social media data dissemination enable the provision of real-time information during a crisis. The information comes from different classes, such as infrastructure damages, persons missing or stranded in the affected zone, etc. Existing methods attempted to classify text and images into various humanitarian categories, but their decision-making process remains largely opaque, which affects their deployment in real-life applications. Recent work has sought to improve transparency by extracting textual rationales from tweets to explain predicted classes. However, such explainable classification methods have mostly focused on text, rather than crisis-related images. In this paper, we propose an interpretable-by-design multimodal classification framework. Our method first learns the joint representation of text and image using a visual language transformer model and extracts text rationales. Next, it extracts the image rationales via the mapping with text rationales. Our approach demonstrates how to learn rationales in one modality from another through cross-modal rationale transfer, which saves annotation effort. Finally, tweets are classified based on extracted rationales. Experiments are conducted over CrisisMMD benchmark dataset, and results show that our proposed method boosts the classification Macro-F1 by 2-35% while extracting accurate text tokens and image patches as rationales. Human evaluation also supports the claim that our proposed method is able to retrieve better image rationale patches (12%) that help to identify humanitarian classes. Our method adapts well to new, unseen datasets in zero-shot mode, achieving an accuracy of 80%.

Thi Huyen Nguyen, Tu Nguyen, Tuan-Anh Hoang et al.

For their attractiveness, comprehensiveness and dynamic coverage of relevant topics, community-based question answering sites such as Stack Overflow heavily rely on the engagement of their communities: Questions on new technologies, technology features as well as technology versions come up and have to be answered as technology evolves (and as community members gather experience with it). At the same time, other questions cease in importance over time, finally becoming irrelevant to users. Beyond filtering low-quality questions, "forgetting" questions, which have become redundant, is an important step for keeping the Stack Overflow content concise and useful. In this work, we study this managed forgetting task for Stack Overflow. Our work is based on data from more than a decade (2008 - 2019) - covering 18.1M questions, that are made publicly available by the site itself. For establishing a deeper understanding, we first analyze and characterize the set of questions about to be forgotten, i.e., questions that get a considerable number of views in the current period but become unattractive in the near future. Subsequently, we examine the capability of a wide range of features in predicting such forgotten questions in different categories. We find some categories in which those questions are more predictable. We also discover that the text-based features are surprisingly not helpful in this prediction task, while the meta information is much more predictive.