Yuri Gurevich, Andreas Blass
A hundred years ago, logic was almost synonymous with foundational studies. The ongoing AI revolution raises many deep foundational problems involving neuroscience, philosophy, computer science, and logic. The goal of the following dialog is to provoke young logicians with a taste for foundations to notice the foundational problems raised by the AI revolution.
Yuri Gurevich
The Fall 2024 Logic in Computer Science column of the Bulletin of EATCS is a little discussion on intelligence, measuring intelligence, and related issues, provoked by a fascinating must-read article ``On the measure of intelligence'' by François Chollet. The discussion includes a modicum of critique of the article.
Yuri Gurevich
This dialog paper offers a preview and provides a foretaste of an upcoming work on the axiomatization of basic interactive algorithms. The modern notion of algorithm was elucidated in the 1930s--1950s. It was axiomatized a quarter of a century ago as the notion of ``sequential algorithm'' or ``classical algorithm''; we prefer to call it ``basic algorithm" now. The axiomatization was used to show that for every basic algorithm there is a behaviorally equivalent abstract state machine. It was also used to prove the Church-Turing thesis as it has been understood by the logicians. Starting from the 1960s, the notion of algorithm has expanded -- probabilistic algorithms, quantum algorithms, etc. -- prompting introduction of a much more ambitious version of the Church-Turing thesis commonly known as the ``physical thesis.'' We emphasize the difference between the two versions of the Church-Turing thesis and illustrate how nondeterministic and probabilistic algorithms can be viewed as basic algorithms with appropriate oracles. The same view applies to quantum circuit algorithms and many other classes of algorithms.
Yuri Gurevich
The Church-Turing thesis asserts that if a partial strings-to-strings function is effectively computable then it is computable by a Turing machine. In the 1930s, when Church and Turing worked on their versions of the thesis, there was a robust notion of algorithm. These traditional algorithms are known also as classical or sequential. In the original thesis, effectively computable meant computable by an effective classical algorithm. Based on an earlier axiomatization of classical algorithms, the original thesis was proven in 2008. Since the 1930s, the notion of algorithm has changed dramatically. New species of algorithms have been and are being introduced. We argue that the generalization of the original thesis, where effectively computable means computable by an effective algorithm of any species, cannot possibly be true.
Yuri Gurevich
Computation models and specification methods seem to be worlds apart. The project on abstract state machines (in short ASMs, also known as evolving algebras) started as an attempt to bridge the gap by improving on Turing's thesis. We sought more versatile machines which would be able to step-for-step simulate arbitrary algorithms on their natural abstraction levels. The ASM thesis asserts that ASMs are such versatile machines. The guide provides the definitions of sequential, parallel and distributed ASMs.