Antonio Giuliano Zippo

2papers

2 Papers

LGSep 27, 2022
DynDepNet: Learning Time-Varying Dependency Structures from fMRI Data via Dynamic Graph Structure Learning

Alexander Campbell, Antonio Giuliano Zippo, Luca Passamonti et al.

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have demonstrated success in learning representations of brain graphs derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. However, existing GNN methods assume brain graphs are static over time and the graph adjacency matrix is known prior to model training. These assumptions contradict evidence that brain graphs are time-varying with a connectivity structure that depends on the choice of functional connectivity measure. Incorrectly representing fMRI data with noisy brain graphs can adversely affect GNN performance. To address this, we propose DynDepNet, a novel method for learning the optimal time-varying dependency structure of fMRI data induced by downstream prediction tasks. Experiments on real-world fMRI datasets, for the task of sex classification, demonstrate that DynDepNet achieves state-of-the-art results, outperforming the best baseline in terms of accuracy by approximately 8 and 6 percentage points, respectively. Furthermore, analysis of the learned dynamic graphs reveals prediction-related brain regions consistent with existing neuroscience literature.

LGOct 29, 2012
Text Classification with Compression Algorithms

Antonio Giuliano Zippo

This work concerns a comparison of SVM kernel methods in text categorization tasks. In particular I define a kernel function that estimates the similarity between two objects computing by their compressed lengths. In fact, compression algorithms can detect arbitrarily long dependencies within the text strings. Data text vectorization looses information in feature extractions and is highly sensitive by textual language. Furthermore, these methods are language independent and require no text preprocessing. Moreover, the accuracy computed on the datasets (Web-KB, 20ng and Reuters-21578), in some case, is greater than Gaussian, linear and polynomial kernels. The method limits are represented by computational time complexity of the Gram matrix and by very poor performance on non-textual datasets.