Thomas Buddenkotte

William McGough, Thomas Buddenkotte, Stephan Ursprung et al.

This study introduces an automated pipeline for renal cancer (RC) detection in non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT). In the development of our pipeline, we test three detections models: a shape model, a 2D-, and a 3D axial-sample model. Training (n=1348) and testing (n=64) data were gathered from open sources (KiTS23, Abdomen1k, CT-ORG) and Cambridge University Hospital (CUH). Results from cross-validation and testing revealed that the 2D axial sample model had the highest small ($\leq$40mm diameter) RC detection area under the curve (AUC) of 0.804. Our pipeline achieves 61.9\% sensitivity and 92.7\% specificity for small kidney cancers on unseen test data. Our results are much more accurate than previous attempts to automatically detect small renal cancers in NCCT, the most likely imaging modality for RC screening. This pipeline offers a promising advance that may enable screening for kidney cancers.

Thomas Buddenkotte, Lorena Escudero Sanchez, Mireia Crispin-Ortuzar et al.

Uncertainty quantification in automated image analysis is highly desired in many applications. Typically, machine learning models in classification or segmentation are only developed to provide binary answers; however, quantifying the uncertainty of the models can play a critical role for example in active learning or machine human interaction. Uncertainty quantification is especially difficult when using deep learning-based models, which are the state-of-the-art in many imaging applications. The current uncertainty quantification approaches do not scale well in high-dimensional real-world problems. Scalable solutions often rely on classical techniques, such as dropout, during inference or training ensembles of identical models with different random seeds to obtain a posterior distribution. In this paper, we show that these approaches fail to approximate the classification probability. On the contrary, we propose a scalable and intuitive framework to calibrate ensembles of deep learning models to produce uncertainty quantification measurements that approximate the classification probability. On unseen test data, we demonstrate improved calibration, sensitivity (in two out of three cases) and precision when being compared with the standard approaches. We further motivate the usage of our method in active learning, creating pseudo-labels to learn from unlabeled images and human-machine collaboration.