Martin Bompaire

Imad Aouali, Amine Benhalloum, Martin Bompaire et al.

Both in academic and industry-based research, online evaluation methods are seen as the golden standard for interactive applications like recommendation systems. Naturally, the reason for this is that we can directly measure utility metrics that rely on interventions, being the recommendations that are being shown to users. Nevertheless, online evaluation methods are costly for a number of reasons, and a clear need remains for reliable offline evaluation procedures. In industry, offline metrics are often used as a first-line evaluation to generate promising candidate models to evaluate online. In academic work, limited access to online systems makes offline metrics the de facto approach to validating novel methods. Two classes of offline metrics exist: proxy-based methods, and counterfactual methods. The first class is often poorly correlated with the online metrics we care about, and the latter class only provides theoretical guarantees under assumptions that cannot be fulfilled in real-world environments. Here, we make the case that simulation-based comparisons provide ways forward beyond offline metrics, and argue that they are a preferable means of evaluation.

Emmanuel Bacry, Martin Bompaire, Stéphane Gaïffas et al.

Tick is a statistical learning library for Python~3, with a particular emphasis on time-dependent models, such as point processes, and tools for generalized linear models and survival analysis. The core of the library is an optimization module providing model computational classes, solvers and proximal operators for regularization. tick relies on a C++ implementation and state-of-the-art optimization algorithms to provide very fast computations in a single node multi-core setting. Source code and documentation can be downloaded from https://github.com/X-DataInitiative/tick

Olivier Jeunen, Dmytro Mykhaylov, David Rohde et al.

In machine learning we often try to optimise a decision rule that would have worked well over a historical dataset; this is the so called empirical risk minimisation principle. In the context of learning from recommender system logs, applying this principle becomes a problem because we do not have available the reward of decisions we did not do. In order to handle this "bandit-feedback" setting, several Counterfactual Risk Minimisation (CRM) methods have been proposed in recent years, that attempt to estimate the performance of different policies on historical data. Through importance sampling and various variance reduction techniques, these methods allow more robust learning and inference than classical approaches. It is difficult to accurately estimate the performance of policies that frequently perform actions that were infrequently done in the past and a number of different types of estimators have been proposed. In this paper, we review several methods, based on different off-policy estimators, for learning from bandit feedback. We discuss key differences and commonalities among existing approaches, and compare their empirical performance on the RecoGym simulation environment. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first comparison study for bandit algorithms in a recommender system setting.

Dmytro Mykhaylov, David Rohde, Flavian Vasile et al.

There are three quite distinct ways to train a machine learning model on recommender system logs. The first method is to model the reward prediction for each possible recommendation to the user, at the scoring time the best recommendation is found by computing an argmax over the personalized recommendations. This method obeys principles such as the conditionality principle and the likelihood principle. A second method is useful when the model does not fit reality and underfits. In this case, we can use the fact that we know the distribution of historical recommendations (concentrated on previously identified good actions with some exploration) to adjust the errors in the fit to be evenly distributed over all actions. Finally, the inverse propensity score can be used to produce an estimate of the decision rules expected performance. The latter two methods violate the conditionality and likelihood principle but are shown to have good performance in certain settings. In this paper we review the literature around this fundamental, yet often overlooked choice and do some experiments using the RecoGym simulation environment.

Martin Bompaire, Emmanuel Bacry, Stéphane Gaïffas

The minimization of convex objectives coming from linear supervised learning problems, such as penalized generalized linear models, can be formulated as finite sums of convex functions. For such problems, a large set of stochastic first-order solvers based on the idea of variance reduction are available and combine both computational efficiency and sound theoretical guarantees (linear convergence rates). Such rates are obtained under both gradient-Lipschitz and strong convexity assumptions. Motivated by learning problems that do not meet the gradient-Lipschitz assumption, such as linear Poisson regression, we work under another smoothness assumption, and obtain a linear convergence rate for a shifted version of Stochastic Dual Coordinate Ascent (SDCA) that improves the current state-of-the-art. Our motivation for considering a solver working on the Fenchel-dual problem comes from the fact that such objectives include many linear constraints, that are easier to deal with in the dual. Our approach and theoretical findings are validated on several datasets, for Poisson regression and another objective coming from the negative log-likelihood of the Hawkes process, which is a family of models which proves extremely useful for the modeling of information propagation in social networks and causality inference.

Emmanuel Bacry, Martin Bompaire, Stéphane Gaïffas et al.

We consider the problem of unveiling the implicit network structure of node interactions (such as user interactions in a social network), based only on high-frequency timestamps. Our inference is based on the minimization of the least-squares loss associated with a multivariate Hawkes model, penalized by $\ell_1$ and trace norm of the interaction tensor. We provide a first theoretical analysis for this problem, that includes sparsity and low-rank inducing penalizations. This result involves a new data-driven concentration inequality for matrix martingales in continuous time with observable variance, which is a result of independent interest and a broad range of possible applications since it extends to matrix martingales former results restricted to the scalar case. A consequence of our analysis is the construction of sharply tuned $\ell_1$ and trace-norm penalizations, that leads to a data-driven scaling of the variability of information available for each users. Numerical experiments illustrate the significant improvements achieved by the use of such data-driven penalizations.