Efren Mezura-Montes

Ishaan R Kale, Anand J Kulkarni, Efren Mezura-Montes

Several Artificial Intelligence based heuristic and metaheuristic algorithms have been developed so far. These algorithms have shown their superiority towards solving complex problems from different domains. However, it is necessary to critically validate these algorithms for solving real-world constrained optimization problems. The search behavior in those problems is different as it involves large number of linear, nonlinear and non-convex type equality and inequality constraints. In this work a 57 real-world constrained optimization problems test suite is solved using two constrained metaheuristic algorithms originated from a socio-based Cohort Intelligence (CI) algorithm. The first CI-based algorithm incorporates a self-adaptive penalty function approach i.e., CI-SAPF. The second algorithm combines CI-SAPF with the intrinsic properties of the physics-based Colliding Bodies Optimization (CBO) referred to CI-SAPF-CBO. The results obtained from CI-SAPF and CI-SAPF-CBO are compared with other constrained optimization algorithms. The superiority of the proposed algorithms is discussed in details followed by future directions to evolve the constrained handling techniques.

Maria-Yaneli Ameca-Alducin, Maryam Hasani-Shoreh, Wilson Blaikie et al.

Dynamic constrained optimization problems (DCOPs) have gained researchers attention in recent years because a vast majority of real world problems change over time. There are studies about the effect of constrained handling techniques in static optimization problems. However, there lacks any substantial study in the behavior of the most popular constraint handling techniques when dealing with DCOPs. In this paper we study the four most popular used constraint handling techniques and apply a simple Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm coupled with a change detection mechanism to observe the behavior of these techniques. These behaviors were analyzed using a common benchmark to determine which techniques are suitable for the most prevalent types of DCOPs. For the purpose of analysis, common measures in static environments were adapted to suit dynamic environments. While an overall superior technique could not be determined, certain techniques outperformed others in different aspects like rate of optimization or reliability of solutions.