Yeyi Guan

Heyuan Huang, Yeyi Guan, Jihong Wang et al.

Large language models (LLMs) have evolved AI assistants into autonomous reasoning engines that maintain context, invoke tools, and pursue long-horizon tasks. This has spurred Agent Operating Systems (Agent OS) as kernel-like layers for lifecycle management, memory, scheduling, and access control. Yet most designs remain agent-centric, treating the OS as a single-host runtime for internal reasoning and tool use, leaving open how autonomous actions integrate with distributed, collaborative, permission-sensitive workflows. TopoClaw is an open-source, human-centric, topology-aware Agent OS modeling the user's ecosystem as two coupled structures: a physical device topology of heterogeneous surfaces and a social relationship topology of shared spaces, teams, and delegated roles. It unifies device operation, messaging, and skills around accountable cross-boundary execution, with three core contributions: (1) cross-device action placement, decoupling intent from actuation and routing distributed actions across the device cluster based on hardware affordances and user context; (2) cross-user identity attribution, treating agents as socially situated "Digital Twins" that coordinate in multi-user spaces while preserving provenance, role-aware permissions, and human accountability; (3) cross-context authority governance, pairing broad capability with distributed, context-aware policy enforcement across physical and social trust boundaries to bound proactive autonomy at the OS layer. This report presents TopoClaw as an engineering-oriented reference architecture, covering its design principles, runtime, cross-device execution, collaboration mechanisms, security model, and deployment outlook.

Weizhen Li, Jianbo Lin, Zhuosong Jiang et al.

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and multi-agent systems have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex problem-solving tasks such as deep research, vibe coding, and mathematical reasoning. However, most existing multi-agent systems are built upon manual prompt/workflow engineering with sophisticated agent frameworks, making them computationally inefficient, less capable, and can not benefit from data-centric learning. In this work, we introduce Chain-of-Agents (CoA), a novel paradigm of LLM reasoning that enables native end-to-end complex problem-solving in the same way as a multi-agent system (i.e., multi-turn problem solving with multiple tools and multiple agents) within one model. In chain-of-agents problem-solving, the model dynamically activates different tool agents and role-playing agents to simulate multi-agent collaboration in an end-to-end fashion. To elicit end-to-end chain-of-agents problem-solving abilities in LLMs, we introduce a multi-agent distillation framework to distill state-of-the-art multi-agent systems into chain-of-agents trajectories for agentic supervised fine-tuning. We then use agentic reinforcement learning on verifiable agentic tasks to further improve the models' capabilities on chain-of-agents problem solving. We call the resulting models Agent Foundation Models (AFMs). Our empirical studies demonstrate that AFM establishes new state-of-the-art performance across diverse benchmarks in both web agent and code agent settings. We make the entire research, including the model weights, code for training and evaluation, and the training data, fully open-sourced, which offers a solid starting point for future research on agent models and agentic RL.

He Zhu, Tianrui Qin, King Zhu et al.

Recently, Agentic AI has become an increasingly popular research field. However, we argue that current agent research practices lack standardization and scientific rigor, making it hard to conduct fair comparisons among methods. As a result, it is still unclear how different design choices in agent frameworks affect effectiveness, and measuring their progress remains challenging. In this work, we conduct a systematic empirical study on GAIA benchmark and BrowseComp to examine the impact of popular design choices in key agent components in a fair and rigorous manner. We find that the lack of a standard evaluation protocol makes previous works, even open-sourced ones, non-reproducible, with significant variance between random runs. Therefore, we introduce a more robust evaluation protocol to stabilize comparisons. Our study reveals which components and designs are crucial for effective agents, while others are redundant, despite seeming logical. Based on our findings, we build and open-source OAgents, a new foundation agent framework that achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source projects. OAgents offers a modular design for various agent components, promoting future research in Agentic AI.