Kimberly McGuire

Arnaud Taffanel, Barbara Rousselot, Jonas Danielsson et al.

The Lighthouse system was originally developed as tracking system for virtual reality applications. Due to its affordable price, it has also found attractive use-cases in robotics in the past. However, existing works frequently rely on the centralized official tracking software, which make the solution less attractive for UAV swarms. In this work, we consider an open-source tracking software that can run onboard small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in real-time and enable distributed swarming algorithms. We provide a dataset specifically for the use cases i) flight; and ii) as ground truth for other commonly-used distributed swarming localization systems such as ultra-wideband. We then use this dataset to analyze both accuracy and precision of the Lighthouse system in different use-cases. To our knowledge, we are the first to compare two different Lighthouse hardware versions with a motion capture system and the first to analyze the accuracy using tracking software that runs onboard a microcontroller.

Kimberly McGuire, Guido de Croon, Karl Tuyls

This paper presents a literature survey and a comparative study of Bug Algorithms, with the goal of investigating their potential for robotic navigation. At first sight, these methods seem to provide an efficient navigation paradigm, ideal for implementations on tiny robots with limited resources. Closer inspection, however, shows that many of these Bug Algorithms assume perfect global position estimate of the robot which in GPS-denied environments implies considerable expenses of computation and memory -- relying on accurate Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (SLAM) or Visual Odometry (VO) methods. We compare a selection of Bug Algorithms in a simulated robot and environment where they endure different types noise and failure-cases of their on-board sensors. From the simulation results, we conclude that the implemented Bug Algorithms' performances are sensitive to many types of sensor-noise, which was most noticeable for odometry-drift. This raises the question if Bug Algorithms are suitable for real-world, on-board, robotic navigation as is. Variations that use multiple sensors to keep track of their progress towards the goal, were more adept in completing their task in the presence of sensor-failures. This shows that Bug Algorithms must spread their risk, by relying on the readings of multiple sensors, to be suitable for real-world deployment.

Steven van der Helm, Kimberly N. McGuire, Mario Coppola et al.

We present a range-based solution for indoor relative localization by Micro Air Vehicles (MAVs), achieving sufficient accuracy for leader-follower flight. Moving forward from previous work, we removed the dependency on a common heading measurement by the MAVs, making the relative localization accuracy independent of magnetometer readings. We found that this restricts the relative maneuvers that guarantee observability, and also that higher accuracy range measurements are required to rectify the missing heading information, yet both disadvantages can be tackled. Our implementation uses Ultra Wide Band, for both range measurements between MAVs and sharing their velocities, accelerations, yaw rates, and height with each other. We used this on real MAVs and performed leader-follower flight in an indoor environment. The follower MAVs could follow the leader MAV in close proximity for the entire durations of the flights. The followers were autonomous and used only on-board sensors to track and follow the leader.

Mario Coppola, Kimberly McGuire, Kirk Y. W. Scheper et al.

Micro Air Vehicles (MAVs) will unlock their true potential once they can operate in groups. To this end, it is essential for them to estimate on-board the relative location of their neighbors. The challenge lies in limiting the mass and processing burden needed to enable this. We developed a relative localization method that only requires the MAVs to communicate via their wireless transceiver. Communication allows the exchange of on-board states (velocity, height, and orientation), while the signal-strength provides range data. These quantities are fused to provide a full relative location estimate. We used our method to tackle the problem of collision avoidance in tight areas. The system was tested with a team of AR.Drones flying in a 4mx4m area and with miniature drones of ~50g in a 2mx2m area. The MAVs were able to track their relative positions and fly several minutes without collisions. Our implementation used Bluetooth to communicate between the drones. This featured significant noise and disturbances in signal-strength, which worsened as more drones were added. Simulation analysis suggests that results can improve with a more suitable transceiver module.