LGOct 21, 2022
Bridging the Gap Between Target Networks and Functional RegularizationAlexandre Piche, Valentin Thomas, Joseph Marino et al. · mila
Bootstrapping is behind much of the successes of Deep Reinforcement Learning. However, learning the value function via bootstrapping often leads to unstable training due to fast-changing target values. Target Networks are employed to stabilize training by using an additional set of lagging parameters to estimate the target values. Despite the popularity of Target Networks, their effect on the optimization is still misunderstood. In this work, we show that they act as an implicit regularizer. This regularizer has disadvantages such as being inflexible and non convex. To overcome these issues, we propose an explicit Functional Regularization that is a convex regularizer in function space and can easily be tuned. We analyze the convergence of our method theoretically and empirically demonstrate that replacing Target Networks with the more theoretically grounded Functional Regularization approach leads to better sample efficiency and performance improvements.
MLOct 21, 2022
Implicit Offline Reinforcement Learning via Supervised LearningAlexandre Piche, Rafael Pardinas, David Vazquez et al.
Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) via Supervised Learning is a simple and effective way to learn robotic skills from a dataset collected by policies of different expertise levels. It is as simple as supervised learning and Behavior Cloning (BC), but takes advantage of return information. On datasets collected by policies of similar expertise, implicit BC has been shown to match or outperform explicit BC. Despite the benefits of using implicit models to learn robotic skills via BC, offline RL via Supervised Learning algorithms have been limited to explicit models. We show how implicit models can leverage return information and match or outperform explicit algorithms to acquire robotic skills from fixed datasets. Furthermore, we show the close relationship between our implicit methods and other popular RL via Supervised Learning algorithms to provide a unified framework. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on high-dimension manipulation and locomotion tasks.
MLNov 19, 2022
Exploring validation metrics for offline model-based optimisation with diffusion modelsChristopher Beckham, Alexandre Piche, David Vazquez et al.
In model-based optimisation (MBO) we are interested in using machine learning to design candidates that maximise some measure of reward with respect to a black box function called the (ground truth) oracle, which is expensive to compute since it involves executing a real world process. In offline MBO we wish to do so without assuming access to such an oracle during training or validation, with makes evaluation non-straightforward. While an approximation to the ground oracle can be trained and used in place of it during model validation to measure the mean reward over generated candidates, the evaluation is approximate and vulnerable to adversarial examples. Measuring the mean reward of generated candidates over this approximation is one such `validation metric', whereas we are interested in a more fundamental question which is finding which validation metrics correlate the most with the ground truth. This involves proposing validation metrics and quantifying them over many datasets for which the ground truth is known, for instance simulated environments. This is encapsulated under our proposed evaluation framework which is also designed to measure extrapolation, which is the ultimate goal behind leveraging generative models for MBO. While our evaluation framework is model agnostic we specifically evaluate denoising diffusion models due to their state-of-the-art performance, as well as derive interesting insights such as ranking the most effective validation metrics as well as discussing important hyperparameters.