Mengdi Chu

Mengdi Chu, Jiaxin Yang, Angus G. Forbes et al.

Modeling temporal evolution is important to analyzing and reasoning about scientific phenomena, yet most machine learning methods provide deterministic forward predictions that overlook multiple plausible outcomes and rarely support backward reasoning, limiting their usefulness in practical scientific workflows. We present a framework that integrates diffusion-based generative modeling with interactive visual analytics for scientific exploration. We introduce DiffUNet^2, a conditional diffusion model that enables bidirectional, any-to-any generation across time and captures distributions of plausible system evolutions. Built upon the model, our interactive system supports branching timeline exploration, user-guided state editing, and probability-space navigation, enabling scientists to actively explore alternative hypotheses rather than passively observe predictions. We evaluate the model on 5 datasets across different scientific domains to validate its predictive accuracy and probability-space ensemble quality. In collaboration with domain experts, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in supporting practical scientific temporal data analysis workflows. By integrating modeling and visual interaction, our approach enables scientists to interactively explore system dynamics, transforming generative models into tools for hypothesis-driven scientific analysis.

Mengdi Chu, Yang Liu, Ayan Biswas et al.

Recent physics foundation models claim general spatiotemporal forecasting ability, yet their evaluations often collapse performance into a single average score under a fixed training distribution. This makes it difficult to determine whether a model has learned generalizable physical dynamics or only performs well under particular settings. We construct a benchmark with 8 physical dynamics, 3 training-data mixtures, and 25 test regimes induced by dynamic-scale and initial-condition complexity shifts, covering in-distribution, distribution-shift, and out-of-distribution settings. We evaluate five physics foundation model architectures and four model variants per architecture (scratch and three pretrained sizes), resulting in 60,000 measurements. Our results show that current physics foundation models behave as conditional rather than universal generalists: their generality depends on the physical regime, temporal scale, initial-condition setting, pretraining, model size, and architecture. Improving the training data distribution only partially mitigates this limitation. Pretraining and scaling are also unable to reliably remove their ability biases. We argue that improving physics foundation models requires moving beyond scaling models or expanding data, toward learning mechanisms that better capture transferable physical knowledge across regimes, temporal scales, and distribution shifts.

Lin Ma, Longrui Chen, Yan Zhang et al.

Pedestrians' safety is a crucial factor in assessing autonomous driving scenarios. However, pedestrian safety evaluation is rarely considered by existing autonomous driving simulation platforms. This paper proposes a pedestrian safety evaluation method for autonomous driving, in which not only the collision events but also the conflict events together with the characteristics of pedestrians are fully considered. Moreover, to apply the pedestrian safety evaluation system, we construct a high-fidelity simulation framework embedded with pedestrian safety-critical characteristics. We demonstrate our simulation framework and pedestrian safety evaluation with a comparative experiment with two kinds of autonomous driving perception algorithms -- single-vehicle perception and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) cooperative perception. The results show that our framework can evaluate different autonomous driving algorithms with detailed and quantitative pedestrian safety indexes. To this end, the proposed simulation method and framework can be used to access different autonomous driving algorithms and evaluate pedestrians' safety performance in future autonomous driving simulations, which can inspire more pedestrian-friendly autonomous driving algorithms.