Xuan Xie

Xuan Xie, Kristian Kersting, Daniel Neider

Formal verification has emerged as a powerful approach to ensure the safety and reliability of deep neural networks. However, current verification tools are limited to only a handful of properties that can be expressed as first-order constraints over the inputs and output of a network. While adversarial robustness and fairness fall under this category, many real-world properties (e.g., "an autonomous vehicle has to stop in front of a stop sign") remain outside the scope of existing verification technology. To mitigate this severe practical restriction, we introduce a novel framework for verifying neural networks, named neuro-symbolic verification. The key idea is to use neural networks as part of the otherwise logical specification, enabling the verification of a wide variety of complex, real-world properties, including the one above. Moreover, we demonstrate how neuro-symbolic verification can be implemented on top of existing verification infrastructure for neural networks, making our framework easily accessible to researchers and practitioners alike.

Renzhi Wang, Zhehua Zhou, Jiayang Song et al.

Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) are increasingly prevalent across various industrial and daily-life domains, with applications ranging from robotic operations to autonomous driving. With recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), learning-based components, especially AI controllers, have become essential in enhancing the functionality and efficiency of CPSs. However, the lack of interpretability in these AI controllers presents challenges to the safety and quality assurance of AI-enabled CPSs (AI-CPSs). Existing methods for improving the safety of AI controllers often involve neural network repair, which requires retraining with additional adversarial examples or access to detailed internal information of the neural network. Hence, these approaches have limited applicability for black-box policies, where only the inputs and outputs are accessible during operation. To overcome this, we propose MORTAR, a runtime action repair framework designed for AI-CPSs in this work. MORTAR begins by constructing a prediction model that forecasts the quality of actions proposed by the AI controller. If an unsafe action is detected, MORTAR then initiates a repair process to correct it. The generation of repaired actions is achieved through an optimization process guided by the safety estimates from the prediction model. We evaluate the effectiveness of MORTAR across various CPS tasks and AI controllers. The results demonstrate that MORTAR can efficiently improve task completion rates of AI controllers under specified safety specifications. Meanwhile, it also maintains minimal computational overhead, ensuring real-time operation of the AI-CPSs.

Da Song, Xuan Xie, Jiayang Song et al.

Over the past decade, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has had great success recently and is being used in a wide range of academic and industrial fields. More recently, LLMs have made rapid advancements that have propelled AI to a new level, enabling even more diverse applications and industrial domains with intelligence, particularly in areas like software engineering and natural language processing. Nevertheless, a number of emerging trustworthiness concerns and issues exhibited in LLMs have already recently received much attention, without properly solving which the widespread adoption of LLMs could be greatly hindered in practice. The distinctive characteristics of LLMs, such as the self-attention mechanism, extremely large model scale, and autoregressive generation schema, differ from classic AI software based on CNNs and RNNs and present new challenges for quality analysis. Up to the present, it still lacks universal and systematic analysis techniques for LLMs despite the urgent industrial demand. Towards bridging this gap, we initiate an early exploratory study and propose a universal analysis framework for LLMs, LUNA, designed to be general and extensible, to enable versatile analysis of LLMs from multiple quality perspectives in a human-interpretable manner. In particular, we first leverage the data from desired trustworthiness perspectives to construct an abstract model as an auxiliary analysis asset, which is empowered by various abstract model construction methods. To assess the quality of the abstract model, we collect and define a number of evaluation metrics, aiming at both abstract model level and the semantics level. Then, the semantics, which is the degree of satisfaction of the LLM w.r.t. the trustworthiness perspective, is bound to and enriches the abstract model with semantics, which enables more detailed analysis applications for diverse purposes.

Xuan Xie, Jiayang Song, Yuheng Huang et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used in many different domains, but because of their limited interpretability, there are questions about how trustworthy they are in various perspectives, e.g., truthfulness and toxicity. Recent research has started developing testing methods for LLMs, aiming to uncover untrustworthy issues, i.e., defects, before deployment. However, systematic and formalized testing criteria are lacking, which hinders a comprehensive assessment of the extent and adequacy of testing exploration. To mitigate this threat, we propose a set of multi-level testing criteria, LeCov, for LLMs. The criteria consider three crucial LLM internal components, i.e., the attention mechanism, feed-forward neurons, and uncertainty, and contain nine types of testing criteria in total. We apply the criteria in two scenarios: test prioritization and coverage-guided testing. The experiment evaluation, on three models and four datasets, demonstrates the usefulness and effectiveness of LeCov.

Xuan Xie, Jiayang Song, Zhehua Zhou et al.

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have seen widespread applications across numerous fields, their limited interpretability poses concerns regarding their safe operations from multiple aspects, e.g., truthfulness, robustness, and fairness. Recent research has started developing quality assurance methods for LLMs, introducing techniques such as offline detector-based or uncertainty estimation methods. However, these approaches predominantly concentrate on post-generation analysis, leaving the online safety analysis for LLMs during the generation phase an unexplored area. To bridge this gap, we conduct in this work a comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of existing online safety analysis methods on LLMs. We begin with a pilot study that validates the feasibility of detecting unsafe outputs in the early generation process. Following this, we establish the first publicly available benchmark of online safety analysis for LLMs, including a broad spectrum of methods, models, tasks, datasets, and evaluation metrics. Utilizing this benchmark, we extensively analyze the performance of state-of-the-art online safety analysis methods on both open-source and closed-source LLMs. This analysis reveals the strengths and weaknesses of individual methods and offers valuable insights into selecting the most appropriate method based on specific application scenarios and task requirements. Furthermore, we also explore the potential of using hybridization methods, i.e., combining multiple methods to derive a collective safety conclusion, to enhance the efficacy of online safety analysis for LLMs. Our findings indicate a promising direction for the development of innovative and trustworthy quality assurance methodologies for LLMs, facilitating their reliable deployments across diverse domains.

Xuan Xie, Fuyuan Zhang

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are widely developed and applied in many areas, and the quality assurance of DNNs is critical. Neural network verification (NNV) aims to provide formal guarantees to DNN models. Similar to traditional software, neural network verifiers could also contain bugs, which would have a critical and serious impact, especially in safety-critical areas. However, little work exists on validating neural network verifiers. In this work, we propose DeepGalaxy, an automated approach based on differential testing to tackle this problem. Specifically, we (1) propose a line of mutation rules, including model level mutation and specification level mutation, to effectively explore the two-dimensional input space of neural network verifiers; and (2) propose heuristic strategies to select test cases. We leveraged our implementation of DeepGalaxy to test three state-of-the-art neural network verifies, Marabou, Eran, and Neurify. The experimental results support the efficiency and effectiveness of DeepGalaxy. Moreover, five unique unknown bugs were discovered