Wouter W. L. Nuijten

AI
h-index7
6papers
5citations
Novelty50%
AI Score47

6 Papers

31.1AIJun 3
What Type of Inference is Active Inference?

Wouter W. L. Nuijten, Mykola Lukashchuk, Thijs van de Laar et al.

Active inference casts decision-making as inference, with the Expected Free Energy (EFE) unifying goal-directed and information-seeking behavior. Recent work showed that EFE minimization can be written as Variational Free Energy (VFE) minimization on a generative model augmented with epistemic priors. We prove that the VFE of the augmented model can be rewritten as the VFE of the predictive model plus explicit entropy-correction terms, making the EFE contribution transparent. We then show that proper EFE-based planning requires combining these epistemic corrections with a planning correction that turns marginal inference into policy optimization, yielding a full variational characterization of EFE-based planning. This clarifies which corrections are needed for cross-entropy planning and for full EFE-based planning. The same entropy-corrected formulation leads to a detailed message-passing scheme for EFE-based planning together with simpler ablations. Experiments on three grid-world environments show that the planning correction already helps when observations are decisive, whereas the additional observation-side epistemic corrections matter most when observations are merely suggestive.

LGJun 9, 2023
Automating Model Comparison in Factor Graphs

Bart van Erp, Wouter W. L. Nuijten, Thijs van de Laar et al.

Bayesian state and parameter estimation have been automated effectively in a variety of probabilistic programming languages. The process of model comparison on the other hand, which still requires error-prone and time-consuming manual derivations, is often overlooked despite its importance. This paper efficiently automates Bayesian model averaging, selection, and combination by message passing on a Forney-style factor graph with a custom mixture node. Parameter and state inference, and model comparison can then be executed simultaneously using message passing with scale factors. This approach shortens the model design cycle and allows for the straightforward extension to hierarchical and temporal model priors to accommodate for modeling complicated time-varying processes.

LGNov 20, 2023
Node Classification in Random Trees

Wouter W. L. Nuijten, Vlado Menkovski

We propose a method for the classification of objects that are structured as random trees. Our aim is to model a distribution over the node label assignments in settings where the tree data structure is associated with node attributes (typically high dimensional embeddings). The tree topology is not predetermined and none of the label assignments are present during inference. Other methods that produce a distribution over node label assignment in trees (or more generally in graphs) either assume conditional independence of the label assignment, operate on a fixed graph topology, or require part of the node labels to be observed. Our method defines a Markov Network with the corresponding topology of the random tree and an associated Gibbs distribution. We parameterize the Gibbs distribution with a Graph Neural Network that operates on the random tree and the node embeddings. This allows us to estimate the likelihood of node assignments for a given random tree and use MCMC to sample from the distribution of node assignments. We evaluate our method on the tasks of node classification in trees on the Stanford Sentiment Treebank dataset. Our method outperforms the baselines on this dataset, demonstrating its effectiveness for modeling joint distributions of node labels in random trees.

27.5SDMar 30
A Probabilistic Generative Model for Spectral Speech Enhancement

Marco Hidalgo-Araya, Raphaël Trésor, Bart Van Erp et al.

Speech enhancement in hearing aids remains a difficult task in nonstationary acoustic environments, mainly because current signal processing algorithms rely on fixed, manually tuned parameters that cannot adapt in situ to different users or listening contexts. This paper introduces a unified modular framework that formulates signal processing, learning, and personalization as Bayesian inference with explicit uncertainty tracking. The proposed framework replaces ad hoc algorithm design with a single probabilistic generative model that continuously adapts to changing acoustic conditions and user preferences. It extends spectral subtraction with principled mechanisms for in-situ personalization and adaptation to acoustic context. The system is implemented as an interconnected probabilistic state-space model, and inference is performed via variational message passing in the \texttt{RxInfer.jl} probabilistic programming environment, enabling real-time Bayesian processing under hearing-aid constraints. Proof-of-concept experiments on the \emph{VoiceBank+DEMAND} corpus show competitive speech quality and noise reduction with 85 effective parameters. The framework provides an interpretable, data-efficient foundation for uncertainty-aware, adaptive hearing-aid processing and points toward devices that learn continuously through probabilistic inference.

AIAug 4, 2025
A Message Passing Realization of Expected Free Energy Minimization

Wouter W. L. Nuijten, Mykola Lukashchuk, Thijs van de Laar et al.

We present a message passing approach to Expected Free Energy (EFE) minimization on factor graphs, based on the theory introduced in arXiv:2504.14898. By reformulating EFE minimization as Variational Free Energy minimization with epistemic priors, we transform a combinatorial search problem into a tractable inference problem solvable through standard variational techniques. Applying our message passing method to factorized state-space models enables efficient policy inference. We evaluate our method on environments with epistemic uncertainty: a stochastic gridworld and a partially observable Minigrid task. Agents using our approach consistently outperform conventional KL-control agents on these tasks, showing more robust planning and efficient exploration under uncertainty. In the stochastic gridworld environment, EFE-minimizing agents avoid risky paths, while in the partially observable minigrid setting, they conduct more systematic information-seeking. This approach bridges active inference theory with practical implementations, providing empirical evidence for the efficiency of epistemic priors in artificial agents.

AINov 24, 2025
Active Inference is a Subtype of Variational Inference

Wouter W. L. Nuijten, Mykola Lukashchuk

Automated decision-making under uncertainty requires balancing exploitation and exploration. Classical methods treat these separately using heuristics, while Active Inference unifies them through Expected Free Energy (EFE) minimization. However, EFE minimization is computationally expensive, limiting scalability. We build on recent theory recasting EFE minimization as variational inference, formally unifying it with Planning-as-Inference and showing the epistemic drive as a unique entropic contribution. Our main contribution is a novel message-passing scheme for this unified objective, enabling scalable Active Inference in factored-state MDPs and overcoming high-dimensional planning intractability.