6.3ROOct 5, 2023
TWICE Dataset: Digital Twin of Test Scenarios in a Controlled EnvironmentLeonardo Novicki Neto, Fabio Reway, Yuri Poledna et al.
Ensuring the safe and reliable operation of autonomous vehicles under adverse weather remains a significant challenge. To address this, we have developed a comprehensive dataset composed of sensor data acquired in a real test track and reproduced in the laboratory for the same test scenarios. The provided dataset includes camera, radar, LiDAR, inertial measurement unit (IMU), and GPS data recorded under adverse weather conditions (rainy, night-time, and snowy conditions). We recorded test scenarios using objects of interest such as car, cyclist, truck and pedestrian -- some of which are inspired by EURONCAP (European New Car Assessment Programme). The sensor data generated in the laboratory is acquired by the execution of simulation-based tests in hardware-in-the-loop environment with the digital twin of each real test scenario. The dataset contains more than 2 hours of recording, which totals more than 280GB of data. Therefore, it is a valuable resource for researchers in the field of autonomous vehicles to test and improve their algorithms in adverse weather conditions, as well as explore the simulation-to-reality gap. The dataset is available for download at: https://twicedataset.github.io/site/
2.6LGMay 1, 2024
Queue-based Eco-Driving at Roundabouts with Reinforcement LearningAnna-Lena Schlamp, Werner Huber, Stefanie Schmidtner
We address eco-driving at roundabouts in mixed traffic to enhance traffic flow and traffic efficiency in urban areas. The aim is to proactively optimize speed of automated or non-automated connected vehicles (CVs), ensuring both an efficient approach and smooth entry into roundabouts. We incorporate the traffic situation ahead, i.e. preceding vehicles and waiting queues. Further, we develop two approaches: a rule-based and an Reinforcement Learning (RL) based eco-driving system, with both using the approach link and information from conflicting CVs for speed optimization. A fair comparison of rule-based and RL-based approaches is performed to explore RL as a viable alternative to classical optimization. Results show that both approaches outperform the baseline. Improvements significantly increase with growing traffic volumes, leading to best results on average being obtained at high volumes. Near capacity, performance deteriorates, indicating limited applicability at capacity limits. Examining different CV penetration rates, a decline in performance is observed, but with substantial results still being achieved at lower CV rates. RL agents can discover effective policies for speed optimization in dynamic roundabout settings, but they do not offer a substantial advantage over classical approaches, especially at higher traffic volumes or lower CV penetration rates.