Mathieu Balesdent

Juliette Gamot, Mathieu Balesdent, Arnault Tremolet et al.

The optimal layout of a complex system such as aerospace vehicles consists in placing a given number of components in a container in order to minimize one or several objectives under some geometrical or functional constraints. This paper presents an extended formulation of this problem as a variable-size design space (VSDS) problem to take into account a large number of architectural choices and components allocation during the design process. As a representative example of such systems, considering the layout of a satellite module, the VSDS aspect translates the fact that the optimizer has to choose between several subdivisions of the components. For instance, one large tank of fuel might be placed as well as two smaller tanks or three even smaller tanks for the same amount of fuel. In order to tackle this NP-hard problem, a genetic algorithm enhanced by an adapted hidden-variables mechanism is proposed. This latter is illustrated on a toy case and an aerospace application case representative to real world complexity to illustrate the performance of the proposed algorithms. The results obtained using the proposed mechanism are reported and analyzed.

Juliette Gamot, Mathieu Balesdent, Romain Wuilbercq et al.

Balanced circular bin packing problems consist in positioning a given number of weighted circles in order to minimize the radius of a circular container while satisfying equilibrium constraints. These problems are NP-hard, highly constrained and dimensional. This paper describes a swarm algorithm based on a virtual-force system in order to solve balanced circular bin packing problems. In the proposed approach, a system of forces is applied to each component allowing to take into account the constraints and minimizing the objective function using the fundamental principle of dynamics. The proposed algorithm is experimented and validated on benchmarks of various balanced circular bin packing problems with up to 300 circles. The reported results allow to assess the effectiveness of the proposed approach compared to existing results from the literature.

Loic Brevault, Mathieu Balesdent

Complex system design problems, such as those involved in aerospace engineering, require the use of numerically costly simulation codes in order to predict the performance of the system to be designed. In this context, these codes are often embedded into an optimization process to provide the best design while satisfying the design constraints. Recently, new approaches, called Quality-Diversity, have been proposed in order to enhance the exploration of the design space and to provide a set of optimal diversified solutions with respect to some feature functions. These functions are interesting to assess trade-offs. Furthermore, complex design problems often involve mixed continuous, discrete, and categorical design variables allowing to take into account technological choices in the optimization problem. Existing Bayesian Quality-Diversity approaches suited for intensive high-fidelity simulations are not adapted to mixed variables constrained optimization problems. In order to overcome these limitations, a new Quality-Diversity methodology based on mixed variables Bayesian optimization strategy is proposed in the context of limited simulation budget. Using adapted covariance models and dedicated enrichment strategy for the Gaussian processes in Bayesian optimization, this approach allows to reduce the computational cost up to two orders of magnitude, with respect to classical Quality-Diversity approaches while dealing with discrete choices and the presence of constraints. The performance of the proposed method is assessed on a benchmark of analytical problems as well as on two aerospace system design problems highlighting its efficiency in terms of speed of convergence. The proposed approach provides valuable trade-offs for decision-markers for complex system design.

Loïc Brevault, Mathieu Balesdent, Ali Hebbal

The design process of complex systems such as new configurations of aircraft or launch vehicles is usually decomposed in different phases which are characterized for instance by the depth of the analyses in terms of number of design variables and fidelity of the physical models. At each phase, the designers have to compose with accurate but computationally intensive models as well as cheap but inaccurate models. Multi-fidelity modeling is a way to merge different fidelity models to provide engineers with accurate results with a limited computational cost. Within the context of multi-fidelity modeling, approaches relying on Gaussian Processes emerge as popular techniques to fuse information between the different fidelity models. The relationship between the fidelity models is a key aspect in multi-fidelity modeling. This paper provides an overview of Gaussian process-based multi-fidelity modeling techniques for variable relationship between the fidelity models (e.g., linearity, non-linearity, variable correlation). Each technique is described within a unified framework and the links between the different techniques are highlighted. All the approaches are numerically compared on a series of analytical test cases and four aerospace related engineering problems in order to assess their benefits and disadvantages with respect to the problem characteristics.

Ali Hebbal, Loic Brevault, Mathieu Balesdent et al.

Multi-fidelity approaches combine different models built on a scarce but accurate data-set (high-fidelity data-set), and a large but approximate one (low-fidelity data-set) in order to improve the prediction accuracy. Gaussian Processes (GPs) are one of the popular approaches to exhibit the correlations between these different fidelity levels. Deep Gaussian Processes (DGPs) that are functional compositions of GPs have also been adapted to multi-fidelity using the Multi-Fidelity Deep Gaussian process model (MF-DGP). This model increases the expressive power compared to GPs by considering non-linear correlations between fidelities within a Bayesian framework. However, these multi-fidelity methods consider only the case where the inputs of the different fidelity models are defined over the same domain of definition (e.g., same variables, same dimensions). However, due to simplification in the modeling of the low-fidelity, some variables may be omitted or a different parametrization may be used compared to the high-fidelity model. In this paper, Deep Gaussian Processes for multi-fidelity (MF-DGP) are extended to the case where a different parametrization is used for each fidelity. The performance of the proposed multifidelity modeling technique is assessed on analytical test cases and on structural and aerodynamic real physical problems.

Julien Pelamatti, Loic Brevault, Mathieu Balesdent et al.

Within the framework of complex system design, it is often necessary to solve mixed variable optimization problems, in which the objective and constraint functions can depend simultaneously on continuous and discrete variables. Additionally, complex system design problems occasionally present a variable-size design space. This results in an optimization problem for which the search space varies dynamically (with respect to both number and type of variables) along the optimization process as a function of the values of specific discrete decision variables. Similarly, the number and type of constraints can vary as well. In this paper, two alternative Bayesian Optimization-based approaches are proposed in order to solve this type of optimization problems. The first one consists in a budget allocation strategy allowing to focus the computational budget on the most promising design sub-spaces. The second approach, instead, is based on the definition of a kernel function allowing to compute the covariance between samples characterized by partially different sets of variables. The results obtained on analytical and engineering related test-cases show a faster and more consistent convergence of both proposed methods with respect to the standard approaches.

Ali Hebbal, Loic Brevault, Mathieu Balesdent et al.

Bayesian Optimization using Gaussian Processes is a popular approach to deal with the optimization of expensive black-box functions. However, because of the a priori on the stationarity of the covariance matrix of classic Gaussian Processes, this method may not be adapted for non-stationary functions involved in the optimization problem. To overcome this issue, a new Bayesian Optimization approach is proposed. It is based on Deep Gaussian Processes as surrogate models instead of classic Gaussian Processes. This modeling technique increases the power of representation to capture the non-stationarity by simply considering a functional composition of stationary Gaussian Processes, providing a multiple layer structure. This paper proposes a new algorithm for Global Optimization by coupling Deep Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Optimization. The specificities of this optimization method are discussed and highlighted with academic test cases. The performance of the proposed algorithm is assessed on analytical test cases and an aerospace design optimization problem and compared to the state-of-the-art stationary and non-stationary Bayesian Optimization approaches.

Ali Hebbal, Loic Brevault, Mathieu Balesdent et al.

Efficient Global Optimization (EGO) is widely used for the optimization of computationally expensive black-box functions. It uses a surrogate modeling technique based on Gaussian Processes (Kriging). However, due to the use of a stationary covariance, Kriging is not well suited for approximating non stationary functions. This paper explores the integration of Deep Gaussian processes (DGP) in EGO framework to deal with the non-stationary issues and investigates the induced challenges and opportunities. Numerical experimentations are performed on analytical problems to highlight the different aspects of DGP and EGO.