Adam A. Porter

ML
5papers
35citations
Novelty59%
AI Score26

5 Papers

MLDec 8, 2022
Structure of Classifier Boundaries: Case Study for a Naive Bayes Classifier

Alan F. Karr, Zac Bowen, Adam A. Porter et al.

Classifiers assign complex input data points to one of a small number of output categories. For a Bayes classifier whose input space is a graph, we study the structure of the \emph{boundary}, which comprises those points for which at least one neighbor is classified differently. The scientific setting is assignment of DNA reads produced by \NGSs\ to candidate source genomes. The boundary is both large and complicated in structure. We introduce a new measure of uncertainty, Neighbor Similarity, that compares the result for an input point to the distribution of results for its neighbors. This measure not only tracks two inherent uncertainty measures for the Bayes classifier, but also can be implemented for classifiers without inherent measures of uncertainty.

GNDec 24, 2021
Application of Markov Structure of Genomes to Outlier Identification and Read Classification

Alan F. Karr, Jason Hauzel, Adam A. Porter et al.

In this paper we apply the structure of genomes as second-order Markov processes specified by the distributions of successive triplets of bases to two bioinformatics problems: identification of outliers in genome databases and read classification in metagenomics, using real coronavirus and adenovirus data.

MLDec 24, 2021
Measuring Quality of DNA Sequence Data via Degradation

Alan F. Karr, Jason Hauzel, Adam A. Porter et al.

We propose and apply a novel paradigm for characterization of genome data quality, which quantifies the effects of intentional degradation of quality. The rationale is that the higher the initial quality, the more fragile the genome and the greater the effects of degradation. We demonstrate that this phenomenon is ubiquitous, and that quantified measures of degradation can be used for multiple purposes. We focus on identifying outliers that may be problematic with respect to data quality, but might also be true anomalies or even attempts to subvert the database.

QMSep 13, 2021
Specified Certainty Classification, with Application to Read Classification for Reference-Guided Metagenomic Assembly

Alan F. Karr, Jason Hauzel, Prahlad Menon et al.

Specified Certainty Classification (SCC) is a new paradigm for employing classifiers whose outputs carry uncertainties, typically in the form of Bayesian posterior probabilities. By allowing the classifier output to be less precise than one of a set of atomic decisions, SCC allows all decisions to achieve a specified level of certainty, as well as provides insights into classifier behavior by examining all decisions that are possible. Our primary illustration is read classification for reference-guided genome assembly, but we demonstrate the breadth of SCC by also analyzing COVID-19 vaccination data.

SEMar 28, 2019
iGen: Dynamic Interaction Inference for Configurable Software

ThanhVu Nguyen, Ugur Koc, Javran Cheng et al.

To develop, analyze, and evolve today's highly configurable software systems, developers need deep knowledge of a system's configuration options, e.g., how options need to be set to reach certain locations, what configurations to use for testing, etc. Today, acquiring this detailed information requires manual effort that is difficult, expensive, and error prone. In this paper, we propose iGen, a novel, lightweight dynamic analysis technique that automatically discovers a program's \emph{interactions}---expressive logical formulae that give developers rich and detailed information about how a system's configuration option settings map to particular code coverage. iGen employs an iterative algorithm that runs a system under a small set of configurations, capturing coverage data; processes the coverage data to infer potential interactions; and then generates new configurations to further refine interactions in the next iteration. We evaluated iGen on 29 programs spanning five languages; the breadth of this study would be unachievable using prior interaction inference tools. Our results show that iGen finds precise interactions based on a very small fraction of the number of possible configurations. Moreover, iGen's results confirm several earlier hypotheses about typical interaction distributions and structures.