Benjamin Poole

Benjamin Poole, Minwoo Lee

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) have allowed for direct communication from the brain to external applications for the automatic detection of cognitive processes such as error recognition. Error-related potentials (ErrPs) are a particular brain signal elicited when one commits or observes an erroneous event. However, due to the noisy properties of the brain and recording devices, ErrPs vary from instance to instance as they are combined with an assortment of other brain signals, biological noise, and external noise, making the classification of ErrPs a non-trivial problem. Recent works have revealed particular cognitive processes such as awareness, embodiment, and predictability that contribute to ErrP variations. In this paper, we explore the performance of classifier transferability when trained on different ErrP variation datasets generated by varying the levels of awareness and embodiment for a given task. In particular, we look at transference between observational and interactive ErrP categories when elicited by similar and differing tasks. Our empirical results provide an exploratory analysis into the ErrP transferability problem from a data perspective.

Benjamin Poole, Andrew Quinn, Li Yang et al.

Data rehearsal has emerged as a leading approach for mitigating catastrophic forgetting in Continual Reinforcement Learning (CRL). However, existing work remains confined to policy gradient frameworks, regularizing only actors due to the performance degradation incurred by critic regularization. This actor-centric approach overlooks the potential of data rehearsal for value function approximation. Moreover, existing evaluations in CRL rarely consider multi-cyclic environments where task sequences repeat, a critical real-world scenario that exacerbates forgetting and plasticity. We investigate data rehearsal for Deep Q-Networks using Q-value regularization in multi-cyclic settings and propose Qreg+NWLU which introduces two simple modifications: (1) continuous data rehearsal that dynamically collects and updates stored Q-values throughout training, and (2) "No-Wait" regularization that applies immediately rather than after the first task. Together, these modifications yield improvements in learning efficiency, forgetting mitigation, and knowledge transfer over Qreg and conventional CRL methods within value function approximation settings.

Benjamin Poole, Minwoo Lee

Reinforcement learning (RL) and brain-computer interfaces (BCI) have experienced significant growth over the past decade. With rising interest in human-in-the-loop (HITL), incorporating human input with RL algorithms has given rise to the sub-field of interactive RL. Adjacently, the field of BCI has long been interested in extracting informative brain signals from neural activity for use in human-computer interactions. A key link between these fields lies in the interpretation of neural activity as feedback such that interactive RL approaches can be employed. We denote this new and emerging medium of feedback as intrinsic feedback. Despite intrinsic feedback's ability to be conveyed automatically and even unconsciously, proper exploration surrounding this key link has largely gone unaddressed by both communities. Thus, to help facilitate a deeper understanding and a more effective utilization, we provide a tutorial-style review covering the motivations, approaches, and open problems of intrinsic feedback and its foundational concepts.