Théo Guyard

LG
h-index2
5papers
9citations
Novelty42%
AI Score42

5 Papers

2.0LGFeb 28, 2023
Safe Peeling for L0-Regularized Least-Squares with supplementary material

Théo Guyard, Gilles Monnoyer, Clément Elvira et al.

We introduce a new methodology dubbed ``safe peeling'' to accelerate the resolution of L0-regularized least-squares problems via a Branch-and-Bound (BnB) algorithm. Our procedure enables to tighten the convex relaxation considered at each node of the BnB decision tree and therefore potentially allows for more aggressive pruning. Numerical simulations show that our proposed methodology leads to significant gains in terms of number of nodes explored and overall solving time.s show that our proposed methodology leads to significant gains in terms of number of nodes explored and overall solving time.

5.8LGMay 7
PACE: Prune-And-Compress Ensemble Models

Fabian Akkerman, Julien Ferry, Théo Guyard et al.

Ensemble models achieve state-of-the-art performance on prediction tasks, but usually require aggregating a large number of weak learners. This can hinder deployment, interpretability, and downstream tasks such as robustness verification. Remedies to this issue fall into two main camps: pruning, which discards redundant learners, and compression, which generates new ones from scratch. We introduce PACE, a framework that interleaves these paradigms in a two-phase strategy. First, new learners are actively generated via a theoretically grounded procedure to enhance the diversity of the initial ensemble. When no more relevant learners can be found, a second phase of pruning is performed on this enriched ensemble. During both operations, PACE allows fine control on the faithfulness to the original ensemble. Experiments show that our method outperforms prior pruning and compression methods while offering principled control of faithfulness guarantees.

4.1OCJun 4, 2025Code
A Generic Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for $\ell_0$-Penalized Problems with Supplementary Material

Clément Elvira, Théo Guyard, Cédric Herzet

We present a generic Branch-and-Bound procedure designed to solve L0-penalized optimization problems. Existing approaches primarily focus on quadratic losses and construct relaxations using "Big-M" constraints and/or L2-norm penalties. In contrast, our method accommodates a broader class of loss functions and allows greater flexibility in relaxation design through a general penalty term, encompassing existing techniques as special cases. We establish theoretical results ensuring that all key quantities required for the Branch-and-Bound implementation admit closed-form expressions under the general blanket assumptions considered in our work. Leveraging this framework, we introduce El0ps, an open-source Python solver with a plug-and-play workflow that enables user-defined losses and penalties in L0-penalized problems. Through extensive numerical experiments, we demonstrate that El0ps achieves state-of-the-art performance on classical instances and extends computational feasibility to previously intractable ones.

2.3MSJun 4, 2025Code
El0ps: An Exact L0-regularized Problems Solver

Théo Guyard, Cédric Herzet, Clément Elvira

This paper presents El0ps, a Python toolbox providing several utilities to handle L0-regularized problems related to applications in machine learning, statistics, and signal processing, among other fields. In contrast to existing toolboxes, El0ps allows users to define custom instances of these problems through a flexible framework, provides a dedicated solver achieving state-of-the-art performance, and offers several built-in machine learning pipelines. Our aim with El0ps is to provide a comprehensive tool which opens new perspectives for the integration of L0-regularized problems in practical applications.

12.2OCJun 3, 2024Code
A New Branch-and-Bound Pruning Framework for $\ell_0$-Regularized Problems

Theo Guyard, Cédric Herzet, Clément Elvira et al.

We consider the resolution of learning problems involving $\ell_0$-regularization via Branch-and-Bound (BnB) algorithms. These methods explore regions of the feasible space of the problem and check whether they do not contain solutions through "pruning tests". In standard implementations, evaluating a pruning test requires to solve a convex optimization problem, which may result in computational bottlenecks. In this paper, we present an alternative to implement pruning tests for some generic family of $\ell_0$-regularized problems. Our proposed procedure allows the simultaneous assessment of several regions and can be embedded in standard BnB implementations with a negligible computational overhead. We show through numerical simulations that our pruning strategy can improve the solving time of BnB procedures by several orders of magnitude for typical problems encountered in machine-learning applications.