Robin Vandaele

Edith Heiter, Robin Vandaele, Tijl De Bie et al.

Unsupervised representation learning methods are widely used for gaining insight into high-dimensional, unstructured, or structured data. In some cases, users may have prior topological knowledge about the data, such as a known cluster structure or the fact that the data is known to lie along a tree- or graph-structured topology. However, generic methods to ensure such structure is salient in the low-dimensional representations are lacking. This negatively impacts the interpretability of low-dimensional embeddings, and plausibly downstream learning tasks. To address this issue, we introduce topological regularization: a generic approach based on algebraic topology to incorporate topological prior knowledge into low-dimensional embeddings. We introduce a class of topological loss functions, and show that jointly optimizing an embedding loss with such a topological loss function as a regularizer yields embeddings that reflect not only local proximities but also the desired topological structure. We include a self-contained overview of the required foundational concepts in algebraic topology, and provide intuitive guidance on how to design topological loss functions for a variety of shapes, such as clusters, cycles, and bifurcations. We empirically evaluate the proposed approach on computational efficiency, robustness, and versatility in combination with linear and non-linear dimensionality reduction and graph embedding methods.

Robin Vandaele, Bo Kang, Jefrey Lijffijt et al.

Unsupervised feature learning often finds low-dimensional embeddings that capture the structure of complex data. For tasks for which prior expert topological knowledge is available, incorporating this into the learned representation may lead to higher quality embeddings. For example, this may help one to embed the data into a given number of clusters, or to accommodate for noise that prevents one from deriving the distribution of the data over the model directly, which can then be learned more effectively. However, a general tool for integrating different prior topological knowledge into embeddings is lacking. Although differentiable topology layers have been recently developed that can (re)shape embeddings into prespecified topological models, they have two important limitations for representation learning, which we address in this paper. First, the currently suggested topological losses fail to represent simple models such as clusters and flares in a natural manner. Second, these losses neglect all original structural (such as neighborhood) information in the data that is useful for learning. We overcome these limitations by introducing a new set of topological losses, and proposing their usage as a way for topologically regularizing data embeddings to naturally represent a prespecified model. We include thorough experiments on synthetic and real data that highlight the usefulness and versatility of this approach, with applications ranging from modeling high-dimensional single-cell data, to graph embedding.

Robin Vandaele, Bo Kang, Tijl De Bie et al.

Distances between data points are widely used in machine learning applications. Yet, when corrupted by noise, these distances -- and thus the models based upon them -- may lose their usefulness in high dimensions. Indeed, the small marginal effects of the noise may then accumulate quickly, shifting empirical closest and furthest neighbors away from the ground truth. In this paper, we exactly characterize such effects in noisy high-dimensional data using an asymptotic probabilistic expression. Previously, it has been argued that neighborhood queries become meaningless and unstable when distance concentration occurs, which means that there is a poor relative discrimination between the furthest and closest neighbors in the data. However, we conclude that this is not necessarily the case when we decompose the data in a ground truth -- which we aim to recover -- and noise component. More specifically, we derive that under particular conditions, empirical neighborhood relations affected by noise are still likely to be truthful even when distance concentration occurs. We also include thorough empirical verification of our results, as well as interesting experiments in which our derived 'phase shift' where neighbors become random or not turns out to be identical to the phase shift where common dimensionality reduction methods perform poorly or well for recovering low-dimensional reconstructions of high-dimensional data with dense noise.