Sam Lapp

Lukas Picek, Timm Haucke, Lukáš Adam et al.

Recognizing individual animals over time is central to many ecological and conservation questions, including estimating abundance, survival, movement, and social structure. Recent advances in automated identification from images and even acoustic data suggest that this process could be greatly accelerated, yet their promise has not translated well into ecological practice. We argue that the main barrier is not the performance of the automated methods themselves, but a mismatch between how those methods are typically developed and evaluated, and how ecological data is actually collected, processed, reviewed, and used. Future progress, therefore, will depend less on algorithmic gains alone than on recognizing that the usefulness of automated identification is grounded in ecological context: it depends on what question is being asked, what data are available, and what kinds of mistakes matter. Only by centering these questions can we move toward automated identification of individuals that is not only accurate but also ecologically useful, transparent, and trustworthy.

Raphael Schwinger, Paria Vali Zadeh, Lukas Rauch et al.

Automated bioacoustic analysis is essential for biodiversity monitoring and conservation, requiring advanced deep learning models that can adapt to diverse bioacoustic tasks. This article presents a comprehensive review of large-scale pretrained bioacoustic foundation models and systematically investigates their transferability across multiple bioacoustic classification tasks. We overview bioacoustic representation learning including major pretraining data sources and benchmarks. On this basis, we review bioacoustic foundation models by thoroughly analysing design decisions such as model architecture, pretraining scheme, and training paradigm. Additionally, we evaluate selected foundation models on classification tasks from the BEANS and BirdSet benchmarks, comparing the generalisability of learned representations under both linear and attentive probing strategies. Our comprehensive experimental analysis reveals that BirdMAE, trained on large-scale bird song data with a self-supervised objective, achieves the best performance on the BirdSet benchmark. On BEANS, BEATs$_{NLM}$, the extracted encoder of the NatureLM-audio large audio model, is slightly better. Both transformer-based models require attentive probing to extract the full performance of their representations. ConvNext$_{BS}$ and Perch models trained with supervision on large-scale bird song data remain competitive for passive acoustic monitoring classification tasks of BirdSet in linear probing settings. Training a new linear classifier has clear advantages over evaluating these models without further training. While on BEANS, the baseline model BEATs trained with self-supervision on AudioSet outperforms bird-specific models when evaluated with attentive probing. These findings provide valuable guidance for practitioners selecting appropriate models to adapt them to new bioacoustic classification tasks via probing.