Maximilian Sprang

Philipp Röchner, Clarissa Krämer, Johannes U Mayer et al.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a key technique for studying the DNA and RNA of organisms. However, identifying quality problems in NGS data across different experimental settings remains challenging. To develop automated quality-control tools, researchers require datasets with features that capture the characteristics of quality problems. Existing NGS repositories, however, offer only a limited number of quality-related features. To address this gap, we propose a dataset derived from 37.491 NGS samples with two types of quality-related feature representations. The first type consists of 34 features derived from quality control tools (QC-34 features). The second type has a variable number of features ranging from eight to 1.183. These features were derived from read counts in problematic genomic regions identified by the ENCODE blocklist (BL features). All features describe the same human and mouse samples from five genomic assays, allowing direct comparison of feature representations. The proposed dataset includes a binary quality label, derived from automated quality control and domain experts. Among all samples, $3.2\%$ are of low quality. Supervised machine learning algorithms accurately predicted quality labels from the features, confirming the relevance of the provided feature representations. The proposed feature representations enable researchers to study how different feature types (QC-34 vs. BL features) and granularities (varying number of BL features) affect the detection of quality problems.

Yujing Ke, Kevin George, Kathan Pandya et al.

Identifying novel hypotheses is essential to scientific research, yet this process risks being overwhelmed by the sheer volume and complexity of available information. Existing automated methods often struggle to generate novel and evidence-grounded hypotheses, lack robust iterative refinement and rarely undergo rigorous temporal evaluation for future discovery potential. To address this, we propose BioDisco, a multi-agent framework that draws upon language model-based reasoning and a dual-mode evidence system (biomedical knowledge graphs and automated literature retrieval) for grounded novelty, integrates an internal scoring and feedback loop for iterative refinement, and validates performance through pioneering temporal and human evaluations and a Bradley-Terry paired comparison model to provide statistically-grounded assessment. Our evaluations demonstrate superior novelty and significance over ablated configurations representative of existing agentic architectures. Designed for flexibility and modularity, BioDisco allows seamless integration of custom language models or knowledge graphs, and can be run with just a few lines of code. We anticipate researchers using this practical tool as a catalyst for the discovery of new hypotheses.