Anup Rao

Raghavendra Addanki, David Arbour, Tung Mai et al.

Treatment effect estimation is a fundamental problem in causal inference. We focus on designing efficient randomized controlled trials, to accurately estimate the effect of some treatment on a population of $n$ individuals. In particular, we study sample-constrained treatment effect estimation, where we must select a subset of $s \ll n$ individuals from the population to experiment on. This subset must be further partitioned into treatment and control groups. Algorithms for partitioning the entire population into treatment and control groups, or for choosing a single representative subset, have been well-studied. The key challenge in our setting is jointly choosing a representative subset and a partition for that set. We focus on both individual and average treatment effect estimation, under a linear effects model. We give provably efficient experimental designs and corresponding estimators, by identifying connections to discrepancy minimization and leverage-score-based sampling used in randomized numerical linear algebra. Our theoretical results obtain a smooth transition to known guarantees when $s$ equals the population size. We also empirically demonstrate the performance of our algorithms.

Branislav Kveton, Anup Rao, Subhojyoti Mukherjee et al.

We introduce AdvantageFlow, a forward-process reinforcement learning algorithm for rectified flow models. Unlike Flow-GRPO, which optimizes the reverse process, we optimize an advantage-weighted forward-process prediction loss. This optimization problem is unstable when advantages are negative and the loss becomes non-convex. We stabilize it by rollout policy regularization, which reduces variance and arises from fitting a local reward-improving target distribution. We evaluate AdvantageFlow on image generation tasks with Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium. It outperforms both Flow-GRPO and a state-of-the-art forward-process RL baseline based on negative-aware fine-tuning.

Nikhil Sheoran, Subrata Mitra, Vibhor Porwal et al.

The goal of Approximate Query Processing (AQP) is to provide very fast but "accurate enough" results for costly aggregate queries thereby improving user experience in interactive exploration of large datasets. Recently proposed Machine-Learning based AQP techniques can provide very low latency as query execution only involves model inference as compared to traditional query processing on database clusters. However, with increase in the number of filtering predicates(WHERE clauses), the approximation error significantly increases for these methods. Analysts often use queries with a large number of predicates for insights discovery. Thus, maintaining low approximation error is important to prevent analysts from drawing misleading conclusions. In this paper, we propose ELECTRA, a predicate-aware AQP system that can answer analytics-style queries with a large number of predicates with much smaller approximation errors. ELECTRA uses a conditional generative model that learns the conditional distribution of the data and at runtime generates a small (~1000 rows) but representative sample, on which the query is executed to compute the approximate result. Our evaluations with four different baselines on three real-world datasets show that ELECTRA provides lower AQP error for large number of predicates compared to baselines.

Sudhanshu Chanpuriya, Ryan A. Rossi, Anup Rao et al.

Many models for undirected graphs are based on factorizing the graph's adjacency matrix; these models find a vector representation of each node such that the predicted probability of a link between two nodes increases with the similarity (dot product) of their associated vectors. Recent work has shown that these models are unable to capture key structures in real-world graphs, particularly heterophilous structures, wherein links occur between dissimilar nodes. In contrast, a factorization with two vectors per node, based on logistic principal components analysis (LPCA), has been proven not only to represent such structures, but also to provide exact low-rank factorization of any graph with bounded max degree. However, this bound has limited applicability to real-world networks, which often have power law degree distributions with high max degree. Further, the LPCA model lacks interpretability since its asymmetric factorization does not reflect the undirectedness of the graph. We address these issues in two ways. First, we prove a new bound for the LPCA model in terms of arboricity rather than max degree; this greatly increases the bound's applicability to many sparse real-world networks. Second, we propose an alternative graph model whose factorization is symmetric and nonnegative, which allows for link predictions to be interpreted in terms of node clusters. We show that the bounds for exact representation in the LPCA model extend to our new model. On the empirical side, our model is optimized effectively on real-world graphs with gradient descent on a cross-entropy loss. We demonstrate its effectiveness on a variety of foundational tasks, such as community detection and link prediction.