Henry Förster

Jacob Miller, Markus Wallinger, Ludwig Felder et al.

In this paper, we test whether Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can match human-subject performance in tasks involving the perception of properties in network layouts. Specifically, we replicate a human-subject experiment about perceiving quality (namely stress) in network layouts using GPT-4o, Gemini-2.5 and Qwen2.5. Our experiments show that giving MLLMs the same study information as trained human participants yields performance comparable to that of human experts and exceeds that of untrained non-experts. Additionally, we show that prompt engineering that deviates from the human-subject experiment can lead to better-than-human performance in some settings. Interestingly, like human subjects, the MLLMs seem to rely on visual proxies rather than computing the actual value of stress, indicating some sense or facsimile of perception. Explanations from the models are similar to those used by the human participants (e.g., an even distribution of nodes and uniform edge lengths).

Timo Brand, Stefan Felsner, Henry Förster et al.

We study the problem of reconfiguring a crossing-free embedding of a graph on a surface, with edges represented as curves, into another crossing-free embedding of the same graph on the same surface with the same fixed vertex positions. In this process, we reroute one edge at a time while maintaining crossing-free intermediate embeddings. This problem was introduced by Ito et al. [TALG 2025], who showed that even if the graph is a matching of two edges, reconfiguration is not always possible in the plane, but is always possible on the torus. For matchings of two or more edges, they gave a necessary and sufficient condition for reconfigurable embeddings in the plane, but not on the torus. Our main result is that for matchings, trees and forests, reconfiguration is always possible on the torus, and consequently, on any orientable surface of genus at least one. In addition, we provide sufficient conditions for reconfiguration on orientable surfaces of genus at least one and in the projective plane. For more general graphs, we show that reconfiguration is not always possible.

Daniel Bertschinger, Henry Förster, Fabian Klute et al.

We study the common intersection of arrangements of double-wedges. We consider arrangements where double-wedges may be either bowties (which do not contain a vertical line) or hourglasses (which contain a vertical line), in contrast to earlier studies that focused on arrangements of only bowties. This generalization changes the setting drastically, in particular, with respect to all arguments involving the point-line duality. Namely, a point in the intersection of all double-wedges is equivalent to a line that stabs a set of segments $\mathcal{S}$ (corresponding to the bowties) while it avoids a different set of segments $\mathcal{A}$ (corresponding to the complement of the hourglasses). We show that in this general setting, the intersection of $n$ double-wedges may consist of $Ω(n^2)$ interior-disjoint regions. Further, we discuss Gallai-type results for arrangements of segments and anti-segments, and we provide algorithms for computing the intersection of such arrangements with worst-case optimal running time. Finally, we also prove that we can find a single intersection point in almost optimal running time, assuming that 3SUM admits no truly subquadratic-time algorithm.

Timo Brand, Henry Förster, Stephen G. Kobourov et al.

We evaluate how visualizations can influence the judgment of MLLMs about the presence or absence of bridges in a network. We show that the inclusion of visualization improves confidence over a structured text-based input that could theoretically be helpful for answering the question. On the other hand, we observe that standard visualization techniques create a strong bias towards accepting or refuting the presence of a bridge -- independently of whether or not a bridge actually exists in the network. While our results indicate that the inclusion of visualization techniques can effectively influence the MLLM's judgment without compromising its self-reported confidence, they also imply that practitioners must be careful of allowing users to include visualizations in generative AI applications so as to avoid undesired hallucinations.

Timo Brand, Henry Förster, Stephen Kobourov et al.

We present a novel approach to graph drawing based on reinforcement learning for minimizing the global and the local crossing number, that is, the total number of edge crossings and the maximum number of crossings on any edge, respectively. In our framework, an agent learns how to move a vertex based on a given observation vector in order to optimize its position. The agent receives feedback in the form of local reward signals tied to crossing reduction. To generate an initial layout, we use a stress-based graph-drawing algorithm. We compare our method against force- and stress-based (baseline) algorithms as well as three established algorithms for global crossing minimization on a suite of benchmark graphs. The experiments show mixed results: our current algorithm is mainly competitive for the local crossing number. We see a potential for further development of the approach in the future.