Amos Korman

Luca Becchetti, Andrea Clementi, Amos Korman et al.

We investigate opinion dynamics in a fully-connected system, consisting of $n$ identical and anonymous agents, where one of the opinions (which is called correct) represents a piece of information to disseminate. In more detail, one source agent initially holds the correct opinion and remains with this opinion throughout the execution. The goal for non-source agents is to quickly agree on this correct opinion, and do that robustly, i.e., from any initial configuration. The system evolves in rounds. In each round, one agent chosen uniformly at random is activated: unless it is the source, the agent pulls the opinions of $\ell$ random agents and then updates its opinion according to some rule. We consider a restricted setting, in which agents have no memory and they only revise their opinions on the basis of those of the agents they currently sample. As restricted as it is, this setting encompasses very popular opinion dynamics, such as the voter model and best-of-$k$ majority rules. Qualitatively speaking, we show that lack of memory prevents efficient convergence. Specifically, we prove that no dynamics can achieve correct convergence in an expected number of steps that is sub-quadratic in $n$, even under a strong version of the model in which activated agents have complete access to the current configuration of the entire system, i.e., the case $\ell=n$. Conversely, we prove that the simple voter model (in which $\ell=1$) correctly solves the problem, while almost matching the aforementioned lower bound. These results suggest that, in contrast to symmetric consensus problems (that do not involve a notion of correct opinion), fast convergence on the correct opinion using stochastic opinion dynamics may indeed require the use of memory. This insight may reflect on natural information dissemination processes that rely on a few knowledgeable individuals.

Matteo Stromieri, Emanuele Natale, Amos Korman

Target shape, not just size, plays a pivotal role in determining detectability during random search. We analyze intermittent Lévy walks in three dimensions, and mathematically prove that the widely observed Cauchy strategy (Lévy exponent $μ= 2$) uniquely achieves scale-invariant, near-optimal detection across a broad spectrum of target sizes and shapes. In a domain of volume $n$ with boundary conditions, expected detection time for a convex target of surface area $Δ$ optimally scales as $n/Δ$. Conversely, Lévy strategies with $μ< 2$ are slow at detecting targets with large surface area-to-volume ratios, while those with $μ> 2$ excel at finding large elongated shapes but degrade as targets become wider. Our results further indicate a continuous geometric transition: volume dictates detection near $μ= 1$, ceding dominance to surface area as $μ\to 2$, after which surface area and elongation couple to govern detection. Ultimately, 3D search introduces a pronounced sensitivity to target shape that is absent in lower dimensions. Our work provides a rigorous foundation for the Lévy flight foraging hypothesis in 3D by establishing the scale-invariant optimality of the Cauchy walk. Furthermore, our results reveal dimensionality-driven shape vulnerabilities and offer testable predictions for biological and engineered systems.

Amos Korman, Yoav Rodeh

We introduce the dependent doors problem as an abstraction for situations in which one must perform a sequence of possibly dependent decisions, without receiving feedback information on the effectiveness of previously made actions. Informally, the problem considers a set of $d$ doors that are initially closed, and the aim is to open all of them as fast as possible. To open a door, the algorithm knocks on it and it might open or not according to some probability distribution. This distribution may depend on which other doors are currently open, as well as on which other doors were open during each of the previous knocks on that door. The algorithm aims to minimize the expected time until all doors open. Crucially, it must act at any time without knowing whether or which other doors have already opened. In this work, we focus on scenarios where dependencies between doors are both positively correlated and acyclic.The fundamental distribution of a door describes the probability it opens in the best of conditions (with respect to other doors being open or closed). We show that if in two configurations of $d$ doors corresponding doors share the same fundamental distribution, then these configurations have the same optimal running time up to a universal constant, no matter what are the dependencies between doors and what are the distributions. We also identify algorithms that are optimal up to a universal constant factor. For the case in which all doors share the same fundamental distribution we additionally provide a simpler algorithm, and a formula to calculate its running time. We furthermore analyse the price of lacking feedback for several configurations governed by standard fundamental distributions. In particular, we show that the price is logarithmic in $d$ for memoryless doors, but can potentially grow to be linear in $d$ for other distributions.We then turn our attention to investigate precise bounds. Even for the case of two doors, identifying the optimal sequence is an intriguing combinatorial question. Here, we study the case of two cascading memoryless doors. That is, the first door opens on each knock independently with probability $p\_1$. The second door can only open if the first door is open, in which case it will open on each knock independently with probability $p\_2$. We solve this problem almost completely by identifying algorithms that are optimal up to an additive term of 1.