Slava Shechtman

h-index11
2papers
541citations

2 Papers

8.0ASSep 20, 2023
Speak While You Think: Streaming Speech Synthesis During Text Generation

Avihu Dekel, Slava Shechtman, Raul Fernandez et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities, yet interaction with these models is mostly facilitated through text. Using Text-To-Speech to synthesize LLM outputs typically results in notable latency, which is impractical for fluent voice conversations. We propose LLM2Speech, an architecture to synthesize speech while text is being generated by an LLM which yields significant latency reduction. LLM2Speech mimics the predictions of a non-streaming teacher model while limiting the exposure to future context in order to enable streaming. It exploits the hidden embeddings of the LLM, a by-product of the text generation that contains informative semantic context. Experimental results show that LLM2Speech maintains the teacher's quality while reducing the latency to enable natural conversations.

16.4ASMay 2, 2019
High quality, lightweight and adaptable TTS using LPCNet

Zvi Kons, Slava Shechtman, Alex Sorin et al.

We present a lightweight adaptable neural TTS system with high quality output. The system is composed of three separate neural network blocks: prosody prediction, acoustic feature prediction and Linear Prediction Coding Net as a neural vocoder. This system can synthesize speech with close to natural quality while running 3 times faster than real-time on a standard CPU. The modular setup of the system allows for simple adaptation to new voices with a small amount of data. We first demonstrate the ability of the system to produce high quality speech when trained on large, high quality datasets. Following that, we demonstrate its adaptability by mimicking unseen voices using 5 to 20 minutes long datasets with lower recording quality. Large scale Mean Opinion Score quality and similarity tests are presented, showing that the system can adapt to unseen voices with quality gap of 0.12 and similarity gap of 3% compared to natural speech for male voices and quality gap of 0.35 and similarity of gap of 9 % for female voices.