Ningzhi Tang

Ningzhi Tang, Chaoran Chen, Gelei Xu et al.

AI coding agents increasingly act directly within software environments, yet existing analyses of their failures rely on benchmark trajectories that miss how developers actually experience misalignment. We present an observational study of 20,574 coding-agent sessions from 1,639 repositories across IDE and CLI workflows. We operationalize misalignment as a breakdown made visible through developer pushback, and annotate each episode along four axes: form, cause, cost, and resolution. We identify seven recurring forms, spanning how agents read projects, interpret developer intent, follow rules, bound their actions, implement and execute code, and report progress. 90.50\% of episodes impose effort and trust costs rather than irreversible system damage, yet 91.49\% of visible resolutions still require explicit user correction. Misalignment patterns also differ across IDE and CLI settings, persist across adjacent sessions, and shift over time: while overall rates decline, constraint violations and inaccurate self-reporting grow in share. Our findings inform the design of training, evaluation, and interfaces for keeping coding agents aligned with real developer workflows.

Liang Qu, Ningzhi Tang, Ruiqi Zheng et al.

Collaborative filtering (CF) based recommender systems are typically trained based on personal interaction data (e.g., clicks and purchases) that could be naturally represented as ego graphs. However, most existing recommendation methods collect these ego graphs from all users to compose a global graph to obtain high-order collaborative information between users and items, and these centralized CF recommendation methods inevitably lead to a high risk of user privacy leakage. Although recently proposed federated recommendation systems can mitigate the privacy problem, they either restrict the on-device local training to an isolated ego graph or rely on an additional third-party server to access other ego graphs resulting in a cumbersome pipeline, which is hard to work in practice. In addition, existing federated recommendation systems require resource-limited devices to maintain the entire embedding tables resulting in high communication costs. In light of this, we propose a semi-decentralized federated ego graph learning framework for on-device recommendations, named SemiDFEGL, which introduces new device-to-device collaborations to improve scalability and reduce communication costs and innovatively utilizes predicted interacted item nodes to connect isolated ego graphs to augment local subgraphs such that the high-order user-item collaborative information could be used in a privacy-preserving manner. Furthermore, the proposed framework is model-agnostic, meaning that it could be seamlessly integrated with existing graph neural network-based recommendation methods and privacy protection techniques. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed SemiDFEGL, extensive experiments are conducted on three public datasets, and the results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed SemiDFEGL compared to other federated recommendation methods.

Ningzhi Tang, David Meininger, Gelei Xu et al.

Code modification requires developers to comprehend code, plan changes, articulate intent, and validate outcomes, making it cognitively demanding. While natural language (NL) code summaries offer a promising external representation of this process, existing approaches remain limited. Systems grounded in exploratory data analysis are restricted to narrow domains, while general-purpose systems enforce fixed NL representations and assume that developers can directly translate vague intent into precise textual edits. We present NaturalEdit, which treats NL code summaries as interactive representations tightly linked to source code. Grounded in the Cognitive Dimensions of Notations, NaturalEdit introduces three key features: (1) adaptive, multi-faceted code summaries with a flexible Abstraction Gradient; (2) interactive mapping mechanisms between summaries and code that ensure tight, structurally stable Closeness of Mapping; and (3) intent-driven bidirectional synchronization that reduces Viscosity during editing while preserving Visibility and Consistency through incremental diffs. A technical evaluation confirms the viability of NaturalEdit, and a user study with 20 developers shows that it improves comprehension, intent articulation, and validation while increasing developers' confidence and sense of control.

Ningzhi Tang, Chaoran Chen, Zihan Fang et al.

IDE-integrated AI coding assistants, which operate conversationally within developers' working codebases with access to project context and multi-file editing, are rapidly reshaping software development. However, empirical investigation of this shift remains limited: existing studies largely rely on small-scale, controlled settings or analyze general-purpose chatbots rather than codebase-aware IDE workflows. We present, to the best of our knowledge, the first large-scale study of real-world conversational programming in IDE-native settings, analyzing 74,998 developer messages from 11,579 chat sessions across 1,300 repositories and 899 developers using Cursor and GitHub Copilot. These chats were committed to public repositories as part of routine development, capturing in-the-wild behavior. Our findings reveal three shifts in how programming work is organized: conversational programming operates as progressive specification, with developers iteratively refining outputs rather than specifying complete tasks upfront; developers redistribute cognitive work to AI, delegating diagnosis, comprehension, and validation rather than engaging with code and outputs directly; and developers actively manage the collaboration, externalizing plans into persistent artifacts, and negotiating AI autonomy through context injection and behavioral constraints. These results provide foundational empirical insights into AI-assisted development and offer implications for the design of future programming environments.

Yinuo Yang, Zheng Zhang, Ningzhi Tang et al.

AI-supported writing tools show strong potential for scaffolding students' learning of argumentative writing. Prior work has demonstrated the benefits of AI-supported cognitive scaffolds, such as idea exploration and argument refinement, but how these features function in authentic classroom settings remains underexplored. In this paper, we investigate the classroom integration of an AI-supported writing tool, VISAR. We deployed VISAR in an undergraduate writing course across three sections for one week each over two semesters (49 students total). Using a mixed-methods approach that combines interaction logs, writing artifact analysis, surveys, and interviews, we examine how students used VISAR features in authentic writing tasks. Our findings confirm that students appropriated AI-supported cognitive scaffolds for writing learning and achieved measurable learning gains. While prior studies suggest that students may bypass important cognitive processes when using AI writing assistants, our classroom deployment shows that when systems provide structured supports for planning and targeted generation, students naturally choose to engage with these cognition-preserving scaffolds. These learning-oriented interaction patterns were positively associated with argumentative writing quality, improved conceptual understanding, and emerging critical AI literacy, highlighting the design value of cognition-preserving features in AI writing tools. Together, these findings provide empirical evidence of how AI-supported writing scaffolds operate in authentic classroom contexts and offer design insights for future learning-oriented AI writing tools.

Gelei Xu, Ningzhi Tang, Xueyang Li et al.

Healthcare automation is shaped by local procedures and organizational constraints, so agent capabilities rarely transfer unchanged across settings. Agent skills, self-contained directories that package reusable procedures for AI agents, are emerging as a procedural layer for adapting healthcare agents across diverse healthcare settings. We present the first empirical analysis of healthcare agent skills, drawing on 557 healthcare-related skills filtered from 58,159 public skills on ClawHub and annotated along ten dimensions covering function, deployment context, autonomy, and safety. We find that public healthcare skills emphasize patient-facing workflow automation and monitoring rather than the diagnostic and treatment-oriented tasks foregrounded in healthcare-agent research; coverage of the healthcare lifecycle and specialized clinical inputs remains uneven; and general technical risk does not reliably capture clinical risk. These findings position healthcare skills as a procedural layer not yet addressed by current benchmarks and risk frameworks.