Christian Schunn

Jie Cao, Chloe Qianhui Zhao, Christian Schunn et al.

Feedback is vital for learning, yet its effectiveness depends not only on its content but also on how it engages students in the learning process. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer novel opportunities to efficiently generate rich, formative feedback, ranging from direct explanations to incrementally layered scaffolding designed to foster learner autonomy. Despite these affordances, it remains unclear whether layered feedback (which sequences encouragement and prompts prior to revealing the correct answer) actually improves engagement and learning outcomes. To address this, we randomly assigned 199 participants to receive either layered or non-layered LLM-generated feedback. We assessed its impact on learning performance, behavioral and cognitive engagement, and affective perceptions, to determine how these factors mediate learning performance. Results indicate that layered feedback elicited slightly higher behavioral engagement and, as anticipated, was perceived as more encouraging and supportive of independence. However, it concurrently induced greater mental effort. Mediation analyses revealed a positive affective pathway driven by perceived encouragement, which was counteracted by a negative behavioral pathway linked to the average number of tasks requiring $\geq 3$ submissions; the cognitive pathway (mental effort) was non-significant. Taken together, layered feedback resulted in significantly poorer learning outcomes compared to non-layered feedback. These findings illuminate a critical trade-off: while layered scaffolding enhances engagement and positive perceptions, it can detrimentally impact actual learning performance. This study contributes nuanced insights for the design of automated, LLM-driven feedback systems by integrating outcome, perception, and mechanism-level analyses.

Raquel Coelho, Roy Pea, Christian Schunn et al.

As quantum information science advances and the need for pre-college engagement grows, a critical question remains: How can young learners be prepared to participate in a field so radically different from what they have encountered before? This paper argues that meeting this challenge will require strong interdisciplinary collaboration with the Learning Sciences (LS), a field dedicated to understanding how people learn and designing theory-guided environments to support learning. Drawing on lessons from previous STEM education efforts, we discuss two key contributions of the learning sciences to quantum information science (QIS) education. The first is design-based research, the signature methodology of learning sciences, which can inform the development, refinement, and scaling of effective QIS learning experiences. The second is a framework for reshaping how learners reason about, learn and participate in QIS practices through shifts in knowledge representations that provide new forms of engagement and associated learning. We call for a two-way partnership between quantum information science and the learning sciences, one that not only supports learning in quantum concepts and practices but also improves our understanding of how to teach and support learning in highly complex domains. We also consider potential questions involved in bridging these disciplinary communities and argue that the theoretical and practical benefits justify the effort.