ROJan 28, 2024Code
GarchingSim: An Autonomous Driving Simulator with Photorealistic Scenes and Minimalist WorkflowLiguo Zhou, Yinglei Song, Yichao Gao et al.
Conducting real road testing for autonomous driving algorithms can be expensive and sometimes impractical, particularly for small startups and research institutes. Thus, simulation becomes an important method for evaluating these algorithms. However, the availability of free and open-source simulators is limited, and the installation and configuration process can be daunting for beginners and interdisciplinary researchers. We introduce an autonomous driving simulator with photorealistic scenes, meanwhile keeping a user-friendly workflow. The simulator is able to communicate with external algorithms through ROS2 or Socket.IO, making it compatible with existing software stacks. Furthermore, we implement a highly accurate vehicle dynamics model within the simulator to enhance the realism of the vehicle's physical effects. The simulator is able to serve various functions, including generating synthetic data and driving with machine learning-based algorithms. Moreover, we prioritize simplicity in the deployment process, ensuring that beginners find it approachable and user-friendly.
ROMar 4
PRAM-R: A Perception-Reasoning-Action-Memory Framework with LLM-Guided Modality Routing for Adaptive Autonomous DrivingYi Zhang, Xian Zhang, Saisi Zhao et al.
Multimodal perception enables robust autonomous driving but incurs unnecessary computational cost when all sensors remain active. This paper presents PRAM-R, a unified Perception-Reasoning-Action-Memory framework with LLM-Guided Modality Routing for adaptive autonomous driving. PRAM-R adopts an asynchronous dual-loop design: a fast reactive loop for perception and control, and a slow deliberative loop for reasoning-driven modality selection and memory updates. An LLM router selects and weights modalities using environmental context and sensor diagnostics, while a hierarchical memory module preserves temporal consistency and supports long-term adaptation. We conduct a two-stage evaluation: (1) synthetic stress tests for stability analysis and (2) real-world validation on the nuScenes dataset. Synthetic stress tests confirm 87.2% reduction in routing oscillations via hysteresis-based stabilization. Real-world validation on nuScenes shows 6.22% modality reduction with 20% memory recall while maintaining comparable trajectory accuracy to full-modality baselines in complex urban scenarios. Our work demonstrates that LLM-augmented architectures with hierarchical memory achieve efficient, adaptive multimodal perception in autonomous driving.
ROJul 31, 2025
A Unified Perception-Language-Action Framework for Adaptive Autonomous DrivingYi Zhang, Erik Leo Haß, Kuo-Yi Chao et al.
Autonomous driving systems face significant challenges in achieving human-like adaptability, robustness, and interpretability in complex, open-world environments. These challenges stem from fragmented architectures, limited generalization to novel scenarios, and insufficient semantic extraction from perception. To address these limitations, we propose a unified Perception-Language-Action (PLA) framework that integrates multi-sensor fusion (cameras, LiDAR, radar) with a large language model (LLM)-augmented Vision-Language-Action (VLA) architecture, specifically a GPT-4.1-powered reasoning core. This framework unifies low-level sensory processing with high-level contextual reasoning, tightly coupling perception with natural language-based semantic understanding and decision-making to enable context-aware, explainable, and safety-bounded autonomous driving. Evaluations on an urban intersection scenario with a construction zone demonstrate superior performance in trajectory tracking, speed prediction, and adaptive planning. The results highlight the potential of language-augmented cognitive frameworks for advancing the safety, interpretability, and scalability of autonomous driving systems.
SENov 26, 2025
LLM-Empowered Event-Chain Driven Code Generation for ADAS in SDV systemsNenad Petrovic, Norbert Kroth, Axel Torschmied et al.
This paper presents an event-chain-driven, LLM-empowered workflow for generating validated, automotive code from natural-language requirements. A Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) layer retrieves relevant signals from large and evolving Vehicle Signal Specification (VSS) catalogs as code generation prompt context, reducing hallucinations and ensuring architectural correctness. Retrieved signals are mapped and validated before being transformed into event chains that encode causal and timing constraints. These event chains guide and constrain LLM-based code synthesis, ensuring behavioral consistency and real-time feasibility. Based on our initial findings from the emergency braking case study, with the proposed approach, we managed to achieve valid signal usage and consistent code generation without LLM retraining.
SEJul 20, 2025
Survey of GenAI for Automotive Software Development: From Requirements to Executable CodeNenad Petrovic, Vahid Zolfaghari, Andre Schamschurko et al.
Adoption of state-of-art Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) aims to revolutionize many industrial areas by reducing the amount of human intervention needed and effort for handling complex underlying processes. Automotive software development is considered to be a significant area for GenAI adoption, taking into account lengthy and expensive procedures, resulting from the amount of requirements and strict standardization. In this paper, we explore the adoption of GenAI for various steps of automotive software development, mainly focusing on requirements handling, compliance aspects and code generation. Three GenAI-related technologies are covered within the state-of-art: Large Language Models (LLMs), Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), Vision Language Models (VLMs), as well as overview of adopted prompting techniques in case of code generation. Additionally, we also derive a generalized GenAI-aided automotive software development workflow based on our findings from this literature review. Finally, we include a summary of a survey outcome, which was conducted among our automotive industry partners regarding the type of GenAI tools used for their daily work activities.