Jungseob Lee

Jungseob Lee, Seungyoon Lee, Suhyune Son et al.

A standard recipe for distilling the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs) is to sample chains of thought from the model, keep those that reach the correct final answer, and fine-tune on the survivors. When sampling fails, a common fix shows the generator the gold answer and asks it to write a chain that reaches that answer. We show that this second step degrades the training data in a way that correctness filtering cannot catch. We run a controlled experiment that fixes the generator, the problem set, and the correctness filter, and varies only whether the chain is generated under answer-conditioning, the gold answer shown with a request to reach it. Training a strong instruction-tuned reasoning model on its own answer-conditioned chains sharply lowers its verifiable-reasoning accuracy. The loss grows with difficulty, reaching as much as about 27 points on the hardest competition problems. The mechanism is legible in the chains themselves, which rationalize backward from the shown answer instead of deriving it, with the early final-answer statement as the measurable symptom. The harm is a property of the data rather than the generator, read off unlabeled generations before any fine-tuning, ordering the penalty across eight thinking models from four families, and transferring across teacher families. A prompt ablation localizes it to the rationalize-toward instruction rather than the answer's bare visibility. The practical takeaway is to generate answer-blind, because no correctness filter can see this damage in the data.

Seongtae Hong, Youngjoon Jang, Jungseob Lee et al.

With the increasing accessibility and utilization of multilingual documents, Cross-Lingual Information Retrieval (CLIR) has emerged as an important research area. Conventionally, CLIR tasks have been conducted under settings where the language of documents differs from that of queries, and typically, the documents are composed in a single coherent language. In this paper, we highlight that in such a setting, the cross-lingual alignment capability may not be evaluated adequately. Specifically, we observe that, in a document pool where English documents coexist with another language, most multilingual retrievers tend to prioritize unrelated English documents over the related document written in the same language as the query. To rigorously analyze and quantify this phenomenon, we introduce various scenarios and metrics designed to evaluate the cross-lingual alignment performance of multilingual retrieval models. Furthermore, to improve cross-lingual performance under these challenging conditions, we propose a novel training strategy aimed at enhancing cross-lingual alignment. Using only a small dataset consisting of 2.8k samples, our method significantly improves the cross-lingual retrieval performance while simultaneously mitigating the English inclination problem. Extensive analyses demonstrate that the proposed method substantially enhances the cross-lingual alignment capabilities of most multilingual embedding models.

Sugyeong Eo, Chanjun Park, Hyeonseok Moon et al.

With the recent advance in neural machine translation demonstrating its importance, research on quality estimation (QE) has been steadily progressing. QE aims to automatically predict the quality of machine translation (MT) output without reference sentences. Despite its high utility in the real world, there remain several limitations concerning manual QE data creation: inevitably incurred non-trivial costs due to the need for translation experts, and issues with data scaling and language expansion. To tackle these limitations, we present QUAK, a Korean-English synthetic QE dataset generated in a fully automatic manner. This consists of three sub-QUAK datasets QUAK-M, QUAK-P, and QUAK-H, produced through three strategies that are relatively free from language constraints. Since each strategy requires no human effort, which facilitates scalability, we scale our data up to 1.58M for QUAK-P, H and 6.58M for QUAK-M. As an experiment, we quantitatively analyze word-level QE results in various ways while performing statistical analysis. Moreover, we show that datasets scaled in an efficient way also contribute to performance improvements by observing meaningful performance gains in QUAK-M, P when adding data up to 1.58M.

Suhyune Son, Chanjun Park, Jungseob Lee et al.

As pre-trained language models become more resource-demanding, the inequality between resource-rich languages such as English and resource-scarce languages is worsening. This can be attributed to the fact that the amount of available training data in each language follows the power-law distribution, and most of the languages belong to the long tail of the distribution. Some research areas attempt to mitigate this problem. For example, in cross-lingual transfer learning and multilingual training, the goal is to benefit long-tail languages via the knowledge acquired from resource-rich languages. Although being successful, existing work has mainly focused on experimenting on as many languages as possible. As a result, targeted in-depth analysis is mostly absent. In this study, we focus on a single low-resource language and perform extensive evaluation and probing experiments using cross-lingual post-training (XPT). To make the transfer scenario challenging, we choose Korean as the target language, as it is a language isolate and thus shares almost no typology with English. Results show that XPT not only outperforms or performs on par with monolingual models trained with orders of magnitudes more data but also is highly efficient in the transfer process.

Jungseob Lee, Chanjun Park, Heuiseok Lim

Multi-agent document assessment for retrieval-augmented generation is computationally expensive, driving practitioners toward smaller, deployable models whose assessment mechanisms remain poorly understood. We conduct a controlled study of training-free interventions on 7B-9B instruction-tuned models across diverse QA benchmarks, revealing a sharp dichotomy in how models benefit from assessment. For weaker baselines, the dominant mechanism is per-document isolation. Astoundingly, assessment-free isolation matches full multi-agent assessment, demonstrating that resolving multi-document context confusion, rather than scoring quality, drives outsized gains of up to 50 percentage points. Conversely, for strong baselines where scoring quality matters, we introduce Reasoning-Score Coupling, a label-free perturbation probe that classifies scoring behavior. Integrating these findings, we propose MADARA, a model-adaptive routing architecture. Crucially, MADARA's diagnostic thresholds derived from a single pilot model generalize zero-shot to four unseen model families, providing a robust, lightweight pipeline to eliminate computational overhead.

Jungseob Lee, Seongtae Hong, Seungjun Lee et al.

Hybrid reasoning models can answer directly or spend extra tokens on extended thinking. A practical router should choose between these modes for each query, so easy problems avoid unnecessary reasoning and hard problems receive enough budget to finish the answer. Existing routers move in this direction, but they typically require labeled training data or fix thinking budgets up front, ignoring answer-level evidence from the model itself. We introduce DART, a training-free routing framework that samples two cheap no-think drafts, accepts direct answering when the drafts agree, and predicts a thinking budget from draft entropy when they disagree. Across the main comparisons, DART preserves or improves always-thinking accuracy in most settings while reducing thinking-token use. On math reasoning, accuracy improves by up to $+$9.0 points on Olympiad-level problems while thinking tokens drop 15-69%. On code reasoning under execution-based equivalence, accuracy improves by up to +22.5 points while thinking tokens drop 51-63%. The Stage~1 signal extends across model scales (0.6B-32B), model families, and API-only hosted settings, with no labeled data and no gradient updates required.

Jungseob Lee, Seungyoon Lee, Seongtae Hong et al.

Training large language models to reason efficiently is a critical challenge. While integrating length-penalizing rewards into Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) aims to reduce verbosity, it frequently triggers reward collapse, severely degrading reasoning capabilities. Through a systematic evaluation of various reward configurations, we identify the root mechanism: GRPO's group normalization creates divergent advantages when incorrect answers receive continuous length penalties. Consequently, methods penalizing the length of incorrect answers are structurally prone to collapse under sustained optimization. Furthermore, restricting penalties exclusively to correct answers avoids this primary failure, but leaves the model susceptible to a stochastic collapse driven by response over-compression. To robustly prevent both failure modes, we propose ACOER (Adaptive Correct-Only Efficiency Reward). ACOER eliminates the structural penalty loop by isolating brevity bonuses to correct completions and prevents stochastic compression via dynamic budget normalization and control-loop penalty adjustments. Evaluated across diverse mathematical reasoning benchmarks, ACOER improves overall accuracy compared to the base model while reducing token generation by over 60%, establishing a fundamentally stable approach for efficiency-aware optimization.

Dongyub Jude Lee, Jungseob Lee, Seungyoon Lee et al.

Alignment tuning is meant to make harmful-request refusal robust, yet this safety behavior can be erased by a small set of benign fine-tuning examples. This is a deployment risk for open-weight models because a checkpoint can pass refusal tests at release time and later lose refusal under low-cost downstream fine-tuning. Prior work has established these refusal failures, but existing studies do not show how to detect this fragility in the aligned model itself before an attack or fine-tuning intervention is run. We introduce Skin-Deep, a geometric diagnostic that detects alignment fragility directly from the aligned model's hidden-state activations before such an intervention is run and compresses the layer-wise safety geometry into a single scalar, the Geometric Fragility Score (GFS). Applied to twenty-one instruction-tuned models spanning six alignment recipes and 3B--32B parameters, Skin-Deep reveals a recurring low-rank safety subspace across model families. Direction ablations show that removing directions in this subspace weakens harmful-request refusal, providing causal evidence that the recovered geometry underlies refusal behavior. Crucially, GFS identifies, before any fine-tuning, the initially safe model that retains the most refusal after small-scale LoRA fine-tuning. These results establish GFS as a practical pre-deployment diagnostic for flagging fragile refusal behavior without running an attack.

Jungseob Lee, Seongtae Hong, Hyeonseok Moon et al.

Adapting large language models to other languages typically employs supervised fine-tuning (SFT) as a standard approach. However, it often suffers from an overemphasis on English performance, a phenomenon that is especially pronounced in data-constrained environments. To overcome these challenges, we propose \textbf{Cross-Lingual Optimization (CLO)} that efficiently transfers an English-centric LLM to a target language while preserving its English capabilities. CLO utilizes publicly available English SFT data and a translation model to enable cross-lingual transfer. We conduct experiments using five models on six languages, each possessing varying levels of resource. Our results show that CLO consistently outperforms SFT in both acquiring target language proficiency and maintaining English performance. Remarkably, in low-resource languages, CLO with only 3,200 samples surpasses SFT with 6,400 samples, demonstrating that CLO can achieve better performance with less data. Furthermore, we find that SFT is particularly sensitive to data quantity in medium and low-resource languages, whereas CLO remains robust. Our comprehensive analysis emphasizes the limitations of SFT and incorporates additional training strategies in CLO to enhance efficiency.

Jungseob Lee, Midan Shim, Suhyune Son et al.

BlenderBot 2.0 is a dialogue model that represents open-domain chatbots by reflecting real-time information and remembering user information for an extended period using an internet search module and multi-session. Nonetheless, the model still has room for improvement. To this end, we examine BlenderBot 2.0 limitations and errors from three perspectives: model, data, and user. From the data point of view, we highlight the unclear guidelines provided to workers during the crowdsourcing process, as well as a lack of a process for refining hate speech in the collected data and verifying the accuracy of internet-based information. From a user perspective, we identify nine types of limitations of BlenderBot 2.0, and their causes are thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, for each point of view, we propose practical improvement methods and discuss several potential future research directions.