Atli Thor Sigurgeirsson

Atli Thor Sigurgeirsson, Simon King

Some recent models for Text-to-Speech synthesis aim to transfer the prosody of a reference utterance to the generated target synthetic speech. This is done by using a learned embedding of the reference utterance, which is used to condition speech generation. During training, the reference utterance is identical to the target utterance. Yet, during synthesis, these models are often used to transfer prosody from a reference that differs from the text or speaker being synthesized. To address this inconsistency, we propose to use a different, but prosodically-related, utterance during training too. We believe this should encourage the model to learn to transfer only those characteristics that the reference and target have in common. If prosody transfer methods do indeed transfer prosody they should be able to be trained in the way we propose. However, results show that a model trained under these conditions performs significantly worse than one trained using the target utterance as a reference. To explain this, we hypothesize that prosody transfer models do not learn a transferable representation of prosody, but rather an utterance-level representation which is highly dependent on both the reference speaker and reference text.

Atli Thor Sigurgeirsson, Simon King

Reference-based Text-to-Speech (TTS) models can generate multiple, prosodically-different renditions of the same target text. Such models jointly learn a latent acoustic space during training, which can be sampled from during inference. Controlling these models during inference typically requires finding an appropriate reference utterance, which is non-trivial. Large generative language models (LLMs) have shown excellent performance in various language-related tasks. Given only a natural language query text (the prompt), such models can be used to solve specific, context-dependent tasks. Recent work in TTS has attempted similar prompt-based control of novel speaking style generation. Those methods do not require a reference utterance and can, under ideal conditions, be controlled with only a prompt. But existing methods typically require a prompt-labelled speech corpus for jointly training a prompt-conditioned encoder. In contrast, we instead employ an LLM to directly suggest prosodic modifications for a controllable TTS model, using contextual information provided in the prompt. The prompt can be designed for a multitude of tasks. Here, we give two demonstrations: control of speaking style; prosody appropriate for a given dialogue context. The proposed method is rated most appropriate in 50% of cases vs. 31% for a baseline model.