Bernhard Strobl

Jannis Priesnitz, Axel Weißenfeld, Laurenz Ruzicka et al.

We propose MCLFIQ: Mobile Contactless Fingerprint Image Quality, the first quality assessment algorithm for mobile contactless fingerprint samples. To this end, we re-trained the NIST Fingerprint Image Quality (NFIQ) 2 method, which was originally designed for contact-based fingerprints, with a synthetic contactless fingerprint database. We evaluate the predictive performance of the resulting MCLFIQ model in terms of Error-vs.-Discard Characteristic (EDC) curves on three real-world contactless fingerprint databases using three recognition algorithms. In experiments, the MCLFIQ method is compared against the original NFIQ 2.2 method, a sharpness-based quality assessment algorithm developed for contactless fingerprint images \rev{and the general purpose image quality assessment method BRISQUE. Furthermore, benchmarks on four contact-based fingerprint datasets are also conducted.} Obtained results show that the fine-tuning of NFIQ 2 on synthetic contactless fingerprints is a viable alternative to training on real databases. Moreover, the evaluation shows that our MCLFIQ method works more accurate and robust compared to all baseline methods on contactless fingerprints. We suggest considering the proposed MCLFIQ method as a \rev{starting point for the development of} a new standard algorithm for contactless fingerprint quality assessment.

Laurenz Ruzicka, Bernhard Strobl, Bernhard Kohn et al.

Fingerprints have long been recognized as a unique and reliable means of personal identification. Central to the analysis and enhancement of fingerprints is the concept of the fingerprint core. Although the location of the core is used in many applications, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the empirical distribution of the core over a large, combined dataset of rolled, as well as plain fingerprint recordings. We identify and investigate the extent of incomplete rolling during the rolled fingerprint acquisition and investigate the centrality of the core. After correcting for the incomplete rolling, we find that the core deviates from the fingerprint center by 5.7% $\pm$ 5.2% to 7.6% $\pm$ 6.9%, depending on the finger. Additionally, we find that the assumption of normal distribution of the core position of plain fingerprint recordings cannot be rejected, but for rolled ones it can. Therefore, we use a multi-step process to find the distribution of the rolled fingerprint recordings. The process consists of an Anderson-Darling normality test, the Bayesian Information Criterion to reduce the number of possible candidate distributions and finally a Generalized Monte Carlo goodness-of-fit procedure to find the best fitting distribution. We find the non-central Fischer distribution best describes the cores' horizontal positions. Finally, we investigate the correlation between mean core position offset and the NFIQ 2 score and find that the NFIQ 2 prefers rolled fingerprint recordings where the core sits slightly below the fingerprint center.