10.4CVJul 16
Team RAS in 11th ABAW Competition: Multimodal Ambivalence Recognition ApproachElena Ryumina, Maxim Markitantov, Alexandr Axyonov et al.
Automatic recognition of ambivalence and hesitancy is challenging because these states may be expressed through inconsistent linguistic, acoustic, facial, and contextual patterns, while top-performing systems often rely on computationally expensive ensembles. We present a single text-centered multimodal approach for video-level ambivalence and hesitancy recognition for the 11th Affective & Behavior Analysis in-the-Wild (ABAW) Challenge. The proposed approach combines linguistic, acoustic, facial, and scene features using text-centered multimodal fusion model. Text Residual Fusion treats text as the anchor modality and applies gated residual adjustments based on the other modalities. Experiments on the Behavioural Ambivalence/Hesitancy (BAH) corpus confirm that text is the strongest unimodal modality. The Text Residual Fusion model achieves an average Macro F1-score (MF1) of 75.14% across the Development and Public Test subsets. On the Private Test subset, it reaches an MF1 of 78.24%, outperforming the text model by 4.03%. These results demonstrate that complementary multimodal information can improve recognition performance without requiring a large model ensemble.
5.1CVMar 13
Team RAS in 10th ABAW Competition: Multimodal Valence and Arousal Estimation ApproachElena Ryumina, Maxim Markitantov, Alexandr Axyonov et al.
Continuous emotion recognition in terms of valence and arousal under in-the-wild (ITW) conditions remains a challenging problem due to large variations in appearance, head pose, illumination, occlusions, and subject-specific patterns of affective expression. We present a multimodal method for valence-arousal estimation ITW. Our method combines three complementary modalities: face, behavior, and audio. The face modality relies on GRADA-based frame-level embeddings and Transformer-based temporal regression. We use Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct to extract behavior-relevant information from video segments, while Mamba is used to model temporal dynamics across segments. The audio modality relies on WavLM-Large with attention-statistics pooling and includes a cross-modal filtering stage to reduce the influence of unreliable or non-speech segments. To fuse modalities, we explore two fusion strategies: a Directed Cross-Modal Mixture-of-Experts Fusion Strategy that learns interactions between modalities with adaptive weighting, and a Reliability-Aware Audio-Visual Fusion Strategy that combines visual features at the frame-level while using audio as complementary context. The results are reported on the Aff-Wild2 dataset following the 10th Affective Behavior Analysis in-the-Wild (ABAW) challenge protocol. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed multimodal fusion strategy achieves a Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) of 0.658 on the Aff-Wild2 development set.
Team LEYA in 10th ABAW Competition: Multimodal Ambivalence/Hesitancy Recognition ApproachElena Ryumina, Alexandr Axyonov, Dmitry Sysoev et al.
Ambivalence/hesitancy recognition in unconstrained videos is a challenging problem due to the subtle, multimodal, and context-dependent nature of this behavioral state. In this paper, a multimodal approach for video-level ambivalence/hesitancy recognition is presented for the 10th ABAW Competition. The proposed approach integrates four complementary modalities: scene, face, audio, and text. Scene dynamics are captured with a VideoMAE-based model, facial information is encoded through emotional frame-level embeddings aggregated by statistical pooling, acoustic representations are extracted with EmotionWav2Vec2.0 and processed by a Mamba-based temporal encoder, and linguistic cues are modeled using fine-tuned transformer-based text models. The resulting unimodal embeddings are further combined using multimodal fusion models, including prototype-augmented variants. Experiments on the BAH corpus demonstrate clear gains of multimodal fusion over all unimodal baselines. The best unimodal configuration achieved an average MF1 of 70.02%, whereas the best multimodal fusion model reached 83.25%. The highest final test performance, 71.43%, was obtained by an ensemble of five prototype-augmented fusion models. The obtained results highlight the importance of complementary multimodal cues and robust fusion strategies for ambivalence/hesitancy recognition.