Zahra Esmaeilbeig

2papers

2 Papers

SPJul 31, 2023
Deep Learning Meets Adaptive Filtering: A Stein's Unbiased Risk Estimator Approach

Zahra Esmaeilbeig, Mojtaba Soltanalian

This paper revisits two prominent adaptive filtering algorithms, namely recursive least squares (RLS) and equivariant adaptive source separation (EASI), through the lens of algorithm unrolling. Building upon the unrolling methodology, we introduce novel task-based deep learning frameworks, denoted as Deep RLS and Deep EASI. These architectures transform the iterations of the original algorithms into layers of a deep neural network, enabling efficient source signal estimation by leveraging a training process. To further enhance performance, we propose training these deep unrolled networks utilizing a surrogate loss function grounded on Stein's unbiased risk estimator (SURE). Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that the Deep RLS and Deep EASI networks outperform their underlying algorithms. Moreover, the efficacy of SURE-based training in comparison to conventional mean squared error loss is highlighted by numerical experiments. The unleashed potential of SURE-based training in this paper sets a benchmark for future employment of SURE either for training purposes or as an evaluation metric for generalization performance of neural networks.

SPNov 15, 2020
Deep-RLS: A Model-Inspired Deep Learning Approach to Nonlinear PCA

Zahra Esmaeilbeig, Shahin Khobahi, Mojtaba Soltanalian

In this work, we consider the application of model-based deep learning in nonlinear principal component analysis (PCA). Inspired by the deep unfolding methodology, we propose a task-based deep learning approach, referred to as Deep-RLS, that unfolds the iterations of the well-known recursive least squares (RLS) algorithm into the layers of a deep neural network in order to perform nonlinear PCA. In particular, we formulate the nonlinear PCA for the blind source separation (BSS) problem and show through numerical analysis that Deep-RLS results in a significant improvement in the accuracy of recovering the source signals in BSS when compared to the traditional RLS algorithm.