IVJul 29, 2023
Interpolation-Split: a data-centric deep learning approach with big interpolated data to boost airway segmentation performanceWing Keung Cheung, Ashkan Pakzad, Nesrin Mogulkoc et al.
The morphology and distribution of airway tree abnormalities enables diagnosis and disease characterisation across a variety of chronic respiratory conditions. In this regard, airway segmentation plays a critical role in the production of the outline of the entire airway tree to enable estimation of disease extent and severity. In this study, we propose a data-centric deep learning technique to segment the airway tree. The proposed technique utilises interpolation and image split to improve data usefulness and quality. Then, an ensemble learning strategy is implemented to aggregate the segmented airway trees at different scales. In terms of segmentation performance (dice similarity coefficient), our method outperforms the baseline model by 2.5% on average when a combined loss is used. Further, our proposed technique has a low GPU usage and high flexibility enabling it to be deployed on any 2D deep learning model.
4.7QMMar 10
Association of Radiologic PPFE Change with Mortality in Lung Cancer Screening CohortsShahab Aslani, Mehran Azimbagirad, Daryl Cheng et al.
Background: Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is an upper lobe predominant fibrotic lung abnormality associated with increased mortality in established interstitial lung disease. However, the clinical significance of radiologic PPFE progression in lung cancer screening populations remains unclear. We investigated whether longitudinal change in PPFE quantified on low dose CT independently associates with mortality and respiratory morbidity. Methods: We analysed longitudinal low-dose CT scans and clinical data from two lung cancer screening studies: the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST; n=7980) and the SUMMIT study (n=8561). An automated algorithm quantified PPFE volume on baseline and follow up scans. Annualised change in PPFE (dPPFE) was derived and dichotomised using a distribution based threshold to define progressive PPFE. Associations between dPPFE and mortality were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographic and clinical variables. In the SUMMIT cohort, dPPFE was also examined in relation to clinical outcomes. Findings: dPPFE independently associated with mortality in both cohorts (NLST: HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.56, p=0.042; SUMMIT: HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.66-5.97, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves showed reduced survival among participants with progressive PPFE in both cohorts. In SUMMIT, dPPFE was associated with higher respiratory admissions (IRR 2.79, p<0.001), increased antibiotic and steroid use (IRR 1.55, p=0.010), and a trend towards higher mMRC scores (OR 1.40, p=0.055). Interpretation: Radiologic PPFE progression independently associates with mortality across two large lung cancer screening cohorts and with adverse clinical outcomes. Quantitative assessment of PPFE progression may provide a clinically relevant imaging biomarker for identifying individuals at increased respiratory risk within screening programmes.