Manyi Zhang

Manyi Zhang, Xuyang Zhao, Jun Yao et al.

Real-world large-scale datasets are both noisily labeled and class-imbalanced. The issues seriously hurt the generalization of trained models. It is hence significant to address the simultaneous incorrect labeling and class-imbalance, i.e., the problem of learning with noisy labels on long-tailed data. Previous works develop several methods for the problem. However, they always rely on strong assumptions that are invalid or hard to be checked in practice. In this paper, to handle the problem and address the limitations of prior works, we propose a representation calibration method RCAL. Specifically, RCAL works with the representations extracted by unsupervised contrastive learning. We assume that without incorrect labeling and class imbalance, the representations of instances in each class conform to a multivariate Gaussian distribution, which is much milder and easier to be checked. Based on the assumption, we recover underlying representation distributions from polluted ones resulting from mislabeled and class-imbalanced data. Additional data points are then sampled from the recovered distributions to help generalization. Moreover, during classifier training, representation learning takes advantage of representation robustness brought by contrastive learning, which further improves the classifier performance. We derive theoretical results to discuss the effectiveness of our representation calibration. Experiments on multiple benchmarks justify our claims and confirm the superiority of the proposed method.

Manyi Zhang, Yuxin Ren, Zihao Wang et al. · tsinghua

Instance-dependent label noise is realistic but rather challenging, where the label-corruption process depends on instances directly. It causes a severe distribution shift between the distributions of training and test data, which impairs the generalization of trained models. Prior works put great effort into tackling the issue. Unfortunately, these works always highly rely on strong assumptions or remain heuristic without theoretical guarantees. In this paper, to address the distribution shift in learning with instance-dependent label noise, a dynamic distribution-calibration strategy is adopted. Specifically, we hypothesize that, before training data are corrupted by label noise, each class conforms to a multivariate Gaussian distribution at the feature level. Label noise produces outliers to shift the Gaussian distribution. During training, to calibrate the shifted distribution, we propose two methods based on the mean and covariance of multivariate Gaussian distribution respectively. The mean-based method works in a recursive dimension-reduction manner for robust mean estimation, which is theoretically guaranteed to train a high-quality model against label noise. The covariance-based method works in a distribution disturbance manner, which is experimentally verified to improve the model robustness. We demonstrate the utility and effectiveness of our methods on datasets with synthetic label noise and real-world unknown noise.

Xiaohao Liu, Xiaobo Xia, Manyi Zhang et al.

Quantization is pivotal for mitigating the significant memory and computational overhead of Large Language Models (LLMs). While emerging transformation-based methods have successfully enhanced quantization by projecting feature spaces onto smoother manifolds using orthogonal matrices, they typically enforce a rigid one-to-one transformation constraint. This static approach fails to account for the dynamic patterns inherent in input activations, particularly within diffusion LLMs (dLLMs) and Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), where varying token types exhibit distinct distributions. To advance this, we propose FreeAct, a novel quantization framework that relaxes the static one-to-one constraint to accommodate dynamic activation disparities. Theoretically, we leverage the rank-deficient nature of activations to derive a solution space that extends beyond simple inverse matrices, enabling the decoupling of activation transformations from weights. Methodologically, FreeAct identifies token-specific dynamics (i.e., vision v.s. text, or masked tokens) and allocates distinct transformation matrices to the activation side, while maintaining a unified, static transformation for the weights. Extensive experiments across dLLMs and MLLMs demonstrate that FreeAct significantly outperforms baselines, up to 5.3% performance improvement, with in-depth analyses. Our code will be publicly released.

Ruikang Liu, Yuxuan Sun, Manyi Zhang et al.

Recent advancements in reasoning language models have demonstrated remarkable performance in complex tasks, but their extended chain-of-thought reasoning process increases inference overhead. While quantization has been widely adopted to reduce the inference cost of large language models, its impact on reasoning models remains understudied. In this paper, we conduct the first systematic study on quantized reasoning models, evaluating the open-sourced DeepSeek-R1-Distilled Qwen and LLaMA families ranging from 1.5B to 70B parameters, QwQ-32B, and Qwen3-8B. Our investigation covers weight, KV cache, and activation quantization using state-of-the-art algorithms at varying bit-widths, with extensive evaluation across mathematical (AIME, MATH-500), scientific (GPQA), and programming (LiveCodeBench) reasoning benchmarks. Our findings reveal that while lossless quantization can be achieved with W8A8 or W4A16 quantization, lower bit-widths introduce significant accuracy risks. We further identify model size, model origin, and task difficulty as critical determinants of performance. Contrary to expectations, quantized models do not exhibit increased output lengths. In addition, strategically scaling the model sizes or reasoning steps can effectively enhance the performance. All quantized models and codes are open-sourced in https://github.com/ruikangliu/Quantized-Reasoning-Models.

Jierun Chen, Tiezheng Yu, Haoli Bai et al.

Large vision-language models (VLMs) increasingly adopt post-training techniques such as long chain-of-thought (CoT) supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) to elicit sophisticated reasoning. While these methods exhibit synergy in language-only models, their joint effectiveness in VLMs remains uncertain. We present a systematic investigation into the distinct roles and interplay of long-CoT SFT and RL across multiple multimodal reasoning benchmarks. We find that SFT improves performance on difficult questions by in-depth, structured reasoning, but introduces verbosity and degrades performance on simpler ones. In contrast, RL promotes generalization and brevity, yielding consistent improvements across all difficulty levels, though the improvements on the hardest questions are less prominent compared to SFT. Surprisingly, combining them through two-staged, interleaved, or progressive training strategies, as well as data mixing and model merging, all fails to produce additive benefits, instead leading to trade-offs in accuracy, reasoning style, and response length. This ``synergy dilemma'' highlights the need for more seamless and adaptive approaches to unlock the full potential of combined post-training techniques for reasoning VLMs.